Seek Returns logo

AR vs. GLNG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AR and GLNG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AR’s market capitalization of 11.57 billion USD is substantially larger than GLNG’s 4.34 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 0.69 for AR and 0.56 for GLNG, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolARGLNG
Company NameAntero Resources CorporationGolar LNG Limited
CountryUSBM
SectorEnergyEnergy
IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Midstream
CEOPaul M. RadyKarl Fredrik Staubo
Price37.26 USD41.49 USD
Market Cap11.57 billion USD4.34 billion USD
Beta0.690.56
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateOctober 10, 2013July 15, 2003
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AR and GLNG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AR vs. GLNG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AR

0.41%

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
40.04%
Q3
19.86%
Median
9.16%
Q1
0.95%
Min
-16.30%

AR’s Return on Equity of 0.41% is in the lower quartile for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

GLNG

0.13%

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
27.45%
Q3
19.75%
Median
15.01%
Q1
8.48%
Min
0.13%

GLNG’s Return on Equity of 0.13% is in the lower quartile for the Oil & Gas Midstream industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

AR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AR

2.48%

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
26.92%
Q3
11.67%
Median
6.24%
Q1
1.35%
Min
-12.56%

AR’s Return on Invested Capital of 2.48% is in line with the norm for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

GLNG

-0.20%

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
20.30%
Q3
12.39%
Median
8.75%
Q1
4.96%
Min
-1.77%

GLNG has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.20%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

AR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AR

0.63%

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
52.19%
Q3
25.60%
Median
13.47%
Q1
2.13%
Min
-32.99%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry, AR’s Net Profit Margin of 0.63% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

GLNG

1.04%

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
48.08%
Q3
33.02%
Median
18.32%
Q1
10.29%
Min
-20.98%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil & Gas Midstream industry, GLNG’s Net Profit Margin of 1.04% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

AR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AR

4.47%

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
52.94%
Q3
36.35%
Median
24.23%
Q1
13.05%
Min
-20.00%

AR’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.47% is in the lower quartile for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

GLNG

-3.15%

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
64.83%
Q3
39.12%
Median
32.11%
Q1
12.82%
Min
-13.33%

GLNG has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -3.15%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolARGLNG
Return on Equity (TTM)0.41%0.13%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.22%0.06%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)2.48%-0.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)0.63%1.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.47%-3.15%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)111.19%35.12%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AR

0.39

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.23
Median
0.89
Q1
0.65
Min
0.27

AR’s Current Ratio of 0.39 falls into the lower quartile for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GLNG

0.85

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
1.64
Median
1.11
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

GLNG’s Current Ratio of 0.85 aligns with the median group of the Oil & Gas Midstream industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AR

0.53

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.67
Median
0.44
Q1
0.28
Min
0.00

AR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 is typical for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GLNG

0.71

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
2.20
Median
1.02
Q1
0.51
Min
0.03

GLNG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.71 is typical for the Oil & Gas Midstream industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AR

2.35

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
20.85
Q3
11.06
Median
5.67
Q1
2.08
Min
-6.70

AR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.35 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GLNG

-7.56

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
9.28
Q3
5.34
Median
4.10
Q1
2.04
Min
-0.53

GLNG has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -7.56. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolARGLNG
Current Ratio (TTM)0.390.85
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.390.85
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.530.71
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.290.32
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)3.529.47
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.35-7.56

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AR and GLNG. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AR

0.00%

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
19.30%
Q3
6.00%
Median
3.36%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GLNG

2.41%

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
24.20%
Q3
7.64%
Median
5.85%
Q1
3.72%
Min
0.00%

GLNG’s Dividend Yield of 2.41% is in the lower quartile for the Oil & Gas Midstream industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

AR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AR

324.36%

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
899.71%
Q3
55.01%
Median
33.88%
Q1
12.33%
Min
0.00%

AR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 324.36% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

GLNG

4,126.77%

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
183.04%
Q3
113.22%
Median
89.17%
Q1
62.10%
Min
0.00%

GLNG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 4,126.77% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

AR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolARGLNG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.41%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)324.36%4126.77%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AR

400.65

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
28.71
Q3
16.76
Median
10.56
Q1
6.59
Min
2.35

At 400.65, AR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

GLNG

1,626.14

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
33.49
Q3
20.27
Median
13.12
Q1
10.61
Min
3.06

At 1,626.14, GLNG’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Oil & Gas Midstream industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AR

120.06

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
2.32
Q3
1.37
Median
0.88
Q1
0.50
Min
0.08

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry.

GLNG

-71.66

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
5.02
Q3
2.74
Median
2.00
Q1
0.54
Min
0.09

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

AR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AR

2.50

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
6.31
Q3
3.18
Median
1.94
Q1
1.00
Min
0.32

AR’s P/S Ratio of 2.50 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GLNG

16.83

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.05
Median
2.30
Q1
1.19
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 16.83, GLNG trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Oil & Gas Midstream industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AR

1.61

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.78
Median
1.16
Q1
0.77
Min
0.23

AR’s P/B Ratio of 1.61 is within the conventional range for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GLNG

2.18

Oil & Gas Midstream Industry

Max
4.33
Q3
2.57
Median
1.77
Q1
1.02
Min
0.31

GLNG’s P/B Ratio of 2.18 is within the conventional range for the Oil & Gas Midstream industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Oil & Gas Midstream industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolARGLNG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)400.651626.14
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)120.06-71.66
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.5016.83
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)1.612.18
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)11.29-51.49
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)14.2255.31
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.3320.31