Seek Returns logo

AR vs. FSLR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AR and FSLR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

FSLR’s market capitalization of 19.84 billion USD is significantly greater than AR’s 11.57 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

FSLR carries a higher beta at 1.53, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AR (beta: 0.69) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolARFSLR
Company NameAntero Resources CorporationFirst Solar, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorEnergyEnergy
IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionSolar
CEOPaul M. RadyMark R. Widmar
Price37.26 USD185.03 USD
Market Cap11.57 billion USD19.84 billion USD
Beta0.691.53
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateOctober 10, 2013November 17, 2006
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AR and FSLR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AR vs. FSLR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AR

0.41%

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
40.04%
Q3
19.86%
Median
9.16%
Q1
0.95%
Min
-16.30%

AR’s Return on Equity of 0.41% is in the lower quartile for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

FSLR

16.31%

Solar Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
16.53%
Median
1.85%
Q1
-58.23%
Min
-159.63%

FSLR’s Return on Equity of 16.31% is on par with the norm for the Solar industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Solar industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AR

2.48%

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
26.92%
Q3
11.67%
Median
6.24%
Q1
1.35%
Min
-12.56%

AR’s Return on Invested Capital of 2.48% is in line with the norm for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

FSLR

13.03%

Solar Industry

Max
23.63%
Q3
15.68%
Median
4.36%
Q1
-5.22%
Min
-19.32%

FSLR’s Return on Invested Capital of 13.03% is in line with the norm for the Solar industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Solar industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AR

0.63%

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
52.19%
Q3
25.60%
Median
13.47%
Q1
2.13%
Min
-32.99%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry, AR’s Net Profit Margin of 0.63% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FSLR

29.72%

Solar Industry

Max
29.72%
Q3
12.13%
Median
2.80%
Q1
-48.40%
Min
-129.97%

A Net Profit Margin of 29.72% places FSLR in the upper quartile for the Solar industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Solar industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AR

4.47%

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
52.94%
Q3
36.35%
Median
24.23%
Q1
13.05%
Min
-20.00%

AR’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.47% is in the lower quartile for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FSLR

32.91%

Solar Industry

Max
32.91%
Q3
13.87%
Median
3.72%
Q1
-58.14%
Min
-166.15%

An Operating Profit Margin of 32.91% places FSLR in the upper quartile for the Solar industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Solar industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolARFSLR
Return on Equity (TTM)0.41%16.31%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.22%10.44%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)2.48%13.03%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)0.63%29.72%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.47%32.91%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)111.19%43.52%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AR

0.39

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.23
Median
0.89
Q1
0.65
Min
0.27

AR’s Current Ratio of 0.39 falls into the lower quartile for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FSLR

1.93

Solar Industry

Max
2.39
Q3
2.15
Median
1.99
Q1
1.75
Min
1.32

FSLR’s Current Ratio of 1.93 aligns with the median group of the Solar industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Solar industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AR

0.53

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.67
Median
0.44
Q1
0.28
Min
0.00

AR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 is typical for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FSLR

0.08

Solar Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
2.22
Median
1.49
Q1
0.75
Min
0.08

Falling into the lower quartile for the Solar industry, FSLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Solar industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AR

2.35

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
20.85
Q3
11.06
Median
5.67
Q1
2.08
Min
-6.70

AR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.35 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FSLR

35.75

Solar Industry

Max
48.80
Q3
25.77
Median
3.70
Q1
-2.52
Min
-6.12

FSLR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 35.75 is in the upper quartile for the Solar industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Solar industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolARFSLR
Current Ratio (TTM)0.391.93
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.391.39
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.530.08
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.290.05
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)3.52-0.12
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.3535.75

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AR and FSLR. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AR

0.00%

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
19.30%
Q3
6.00%
Median
3.36%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FSLR

0.00%

Solar Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FSLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Solar industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AR

324.36%

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
899.71%
Q3
55.01%
Median
33.88%
Q1
12.33%
Min
0.00%

AR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 324.36% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

FSLR

0.00%

Solar Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FSLR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Solar industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolARFSLR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)324.36%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AR

400.65

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
28.71
Q3
16.76
Median
10.56
Q1
6.59
Min
2.35

At 400.65, AR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FSLR

15.67

Solar Industry

Max
36.31
Q3
35.43
Median
25.87
Q1
15.67
Min
12.88

FSLR’s P/E Ratio of 15.67 is within the middle range for the Solar industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Solar industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AR

120.06

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
2.32
Q3
1.37
Median
0.88
Q1
0.50
Min
0.08

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry.

FSLR

0.71

Solar Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
2.18
Median
2.08
Q1
1.33
Min
0.58

In the lower quartile for the Solar industry, FSLR’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.71 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

AR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Solar industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AR

2.50

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
6.31
Q3
3.18
Median
1.94
Q1
1.00
Min
0.32

AR’s P/S Ratio of 2.50 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FSLR

4.66

Solar Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
3.13
Median
1.65
Q1
0.90
Min
0.13

With a P/S Ratio of 4.66, FSLR trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Solar industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Solar industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AR

1.61

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.78
Median
1.16
Q1
0.77
Min
0.23

AR’s P/B Ratio of 1.61 is within the conventional range for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FSLR

2.42

Solar Industry

Max
6.65
Q3
3.57
Median
1.96
Q1
1.22
Min
0.27

FSLR’s P/B Ratio of 2.42 is within the conventional range for the Solar industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Solar industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolARFSLR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)400.6515.67
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)120.060.71
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.504.66
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)1.612.42
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)11.29-20.33
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)14.2211.37
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.334.61