AR vs. FSLR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

With AR at 11.98 billion USD and FSLR at 16.75 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.

FSLR carries a higher beta at 1.46, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AR remains steadier at 0.66.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of AR and FSLR over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AR and FSLR based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

• AR stands out with a premium P/E of 414.74, while FSLR at 13.21 remains within a more conventional earnings multiple.
• FSLR reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -17.14, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while AR at 11.68 maintains positive cash flow.

Dividend Comparison

Neither AR nor FSLR currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of AR and FSLR, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

• AR’s current ratio of 0.39 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while FSLR at 1.93 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
• AR’s quick ratio of 0.39 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas FSLR at 1.39 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.