AR vs. EXE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AR and EXE, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
EXE stands out with 27.30 billion USD in market value—about 2.25× AR’s market cap of 12.14 billion USD.
AR’s beta of 0.66 points to much larger expected swings compared to EXE’s calmer 0.44, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | AR | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Antero Resources Corporation | Expand Energy Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| CEO | Mr. Paul M. Rady | Mr. Domenic J. Dell'Osso Jr. |
| Price | 39.11 USD | 114.71 USD |
| Market Cap | 12.14 billion USD | 27.30 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.66 | 0.44 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | October 10, 2013 | February 10, 2021 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AR and EXE over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AR and EXE based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AR trades at a lofty P/E of 420.54, implying strong growth expectations, in contrast to EXE’s negative P/E of -27.19 driven by recent losses.
- EXE shows a negative forward PEG of -5.37, signaling expected earnings contraction, while AR at 124.18 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
| Symbol | AR | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 420.54 | -27.19 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 124.18 | -5.37 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 2.63 | 5.10 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 1.69 | 1.56 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 11.85 | 67.24 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 14.75 | 26.66 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 3.45 | 5.03 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 15.56 | 66.38 |
Dividend Comparison
AR offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while EXE provides a 1.50% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | AR | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 1.50% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AR and EXE, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.39 and 0.59, both AR and EXE have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both AR (quick ratio 0.39) and EXE (quick ratio 0.59) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
- AR meets its interest obligations (ratio 2.35). In stark contrast, EXE’s negative ratio (-10.30) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
| Symbol | AR | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.39 | 0.59 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.39 | 0.59 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.53 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 2.35 | -10.30 |