AR vs. EQT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AR and EQT, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
EQT stands out with 33.35 billion USD in market value—about 2.75× AR’s market cap of 12.14 billion USD.
With betas of 0.66 for AR and 0.59 for EQT, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AR | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Antero Resources Corporation | EQT Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| CEO | Mr. Paul M. Rady | Mr. Toby Z. Rice |
| Price | 39.11 USD | 55.71 USD |
| Market Cap | 12.14 billion USD | 33.35 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.66 | 0.59 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | October 10, 2013 | March 17, 1980 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AR and EQT over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AR and EQT based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AR stands out with a premium P/E of 420.54, while EQT at 38.16 remains within a more conventional earnings multiple.
| Symbol | AR | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 420.54 | 38.16 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 124.18 | 3.40 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 2.63 | 4.61 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 1.69 | 1.93 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 11.85 | 28.80 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 14.75 | 18.08 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 3.45 | 4.38 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 15.56 | 27.38 |
Dividend Comparison
AR offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while EQT provides a 3.50% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | AR | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 3.50% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AR and EQT, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AR’s current ratio of 0.39 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while EQT at 7.41 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- AR’s quick ratio of 0.39 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas EQT at 7.41 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
| Symbol | AR | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.39 | 7.41 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.39 | 7.41 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.53 | 0.18 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 0.14 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 2.35 | 16.48 |