Seek Returns logo

AR vs. CCJ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AR and CCJ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

CCJ’s market capitalization of 31.97 billion USD is significantly greater than AR’s 11.57 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

CCJ carries a higher beta at 1.18, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AR (beta: 0.69) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolARCCJ
Company NameAntero Resources CorporationCameco Corporation
CountryUSCA
SectorEnergyEnergy
IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionUranium
CEOPaul M. RadyTimothy S. Gitzel
Price37.26 USD73.45 USD
Market Cap11.57 billion USD31.97 billion USD
Beta0.691.18
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateOctober 10, 2013March 14, 1996
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AR and CCJ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AR vs. CCJ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AR

0.41%

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
40.04%
Q3
19.86%
Median
9.16%
Q1
0.95%
Min
-16.30%

AR’s Return on Equity of 0.41% is in the lower quartile for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CCJ

3.94%

Uranium Industry

Max
3.94%
Q3
-1.43%
Median
-8.98%
Q1
-16.36%
Min
-36.32%

In the upper quartile for the Uranium industry, CCJ’s Return on Equity of 3.94% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Uranium industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AR

2.48%

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
26.92%
Q3
11.67%
Median
6.24%
Q1
1.35%
Min
-12.56%

AR’s Return on Invested Capital of 2.48% is in line with the norm for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

CCJ

4.43%

Uranium Industry

Max
9.56%
Q3
-0.34%
Median
-6.51%
Q1
-11.17%
Min
-17.43%

In the upper quartile for the Uranium industry, CCJ’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.43% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Uranium industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AR

0.63%

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
52.19%
Q3
25.60%
Median
13.47%
Q1
2.13%
Min
-32.99%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry, AR’s Net Profit Margin of 0.63% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CCJ

7.55%

Uranium Industry

Max
22.59%
Q3
5.38%
Median
-101.40%
Q1
-124.30%
Min
-162.13%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.55% places CCJ in the upper quartile for the Uranium industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Uranium industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AR

4.47%

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
52.94%
Q3
36.35%
Median
24.23%
Q1
13.05%
Min
-20.00%

AR’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.47% is in the lower quartile for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CCJ

17.00%

Uranium Industry

Max
17.00%
Q3
1.49%
Median
-88.81%
Q1
-148.60%
Min
-222.98%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.00% places CCJ in the upper quartile for the Uranium industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Uranium industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolARCCJ
Return on Equity (TTM)0.41%3.94%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.22%2.65%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)2.48%4.43%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)0.63%7.55%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.47%17.00%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)111.19%29.20%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AR

0.39

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.23
Median
0.89
Q1
0.65
Min
0.27

AR’s Current Ratio of 0.39 falls into the lower quartile for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CCJ

2.71

Uranium Industry

Max
9.44
Q3
5.77
Median
3.28
Q1
2.74
Min
1.03

CCJ’s Current Ratio of 2.71 falls into the lower quartile for the Uranium industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Uranium industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AR

0.53

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.67
Median
0.44
Q1
0.28
Min
0.00

AR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 is typical for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CCJ

0.15

Uranium Industry

Max
0.39
Q3
0.27
Median
0.07
Q1
0.03
Min
0.00

CCJ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 is typical for the Uranium industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Uranium industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AR

2.35

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
20.85
Q3
11.06
Median
5.67
Q1
2.08
Min
-6.70

AR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.35 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CCJ

4.64

Uranium Industry

Max
13.88
Q3
-1.64
Median
-22.34
Q1
-47.73
Min
-67.51

CCJ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.64 is in the upper quartile for the Uranium industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Uranium industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolARCCJ
Current Ratio (TTM)0.392.71
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.390.99
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.530.15
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.290.11
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)3.520.82
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.354.64

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AR and CCJ. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AR

0.00%

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
19.30%
Q3
6.00%
Median
3.36%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CCJ

0.16%

Uranium Industry

Max
0.16%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CCJ’s Dividend Yield of 0.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Uranium industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

AR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Uranium industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AR

324.36%

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
899.71%
Q3
55.01%
Median
33.88%
Q1
12.33%
Min
0.00%

AR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 324.36% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

CCJ

28.00%

Uranium Industry

Max
28.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CCJ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.00% is in the upper quartile for the Uranium industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Uranium industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolARCCJ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.16%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)324.36%28.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AR

400.65

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
28.71
Q3
16.76
Median
10.56
Q1
6.59
Min
2.35

At 400.65, AR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CCJ

174.30

Uranium Industry

Max
401.74
Q3
288.75
Median
175.77
Q1
101.33
Min
26.89

CCJ’s P/E Ratio of 174.30 is within the middle range for the Uranium industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Uranium industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AR

120.06

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
2.32
Q3
1.37
Median
0.88
Q1
0.50
Min
0.08

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry.

CCJ

7.16

Uranium Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.76
Median
0.67
Q1
0.11
Min
0.02

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Uranium industry.

AR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Uranium industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AR

2.50

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
6.31
Q3
3.18
Median
1.94
Q1
1.00
Min
0.32

AR’s P/S Ratio of 2.50 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CCJ

13.17

Uranium Industry

Max
44.61
Q3
25.45
Median
15.28
Q1
11.87
Min
5.84

CCJ’s P/S Ratio of 13.17 aligns with the market consensus for the Uranium industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Uranium industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AR

1.61

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.78
Median
1.16
Q1
0.77
Min
0.23

AR’s P/B Ratio of 1.61 is within the conventional range for the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CCJ

6.68

Uranium Industry

Max
6.73
Q3
4.34
Median
3.10
Q1
1.76
Min
0.50

CCJ’s P/B Ratio of 6.68 is in the upper tier for the Uranium industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AR vs. CCJ: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Oil & Gas Exploration & Production and Uranium industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolARCCJ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)400.65174.30
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)120.067.16
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.5013.17
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)1.616.68
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)11.2964.13
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)14.2256.73
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.3313.36