AR vs. CCJ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AR and CCJ, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
CCJ stands out with 22.85 billion USD in market value—about 1.88× AR’s market cap of 12.14 billion USD.
CCJ carries a higher beta at 1.05, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AR remains steadier at 0.66.
| Symbol | AR | CCJ |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Antero Resources Corporation | Cameco Corporation |
| Country | US | CA |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Uranium |
| CEO | Mr. Paul M. Rady | Mr. Timothy S. Gitzel |
| Price | 39.11 USD | 52.485 USD |
| Market Cap | 12.14 billion USD | 22.85 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.66 | 1.05 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | October 10, 2013 | March 14, 1996 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AR and CCJ over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AR and CCJ based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AR and CCJ both trade above a 100× earnings multiple (420.54 and 127.51), reflecting lofty growth narratives priced into their shares.
| Symbol | AR | CCJ |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 420.54 | 127.51 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 124.18 | 4.56 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 2.63 | 9.63 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 1.69 | 4.88 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 11.85 | 46.91 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 14.75 | 41.72 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 3.45 | 9.83 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 15.56 | 47.85 |
Dividend Comparison
AR offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while CCJ provides a 0.22% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | AR | CCJ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.22% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AR and CCJ, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AR’s current ratio of 0.39 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while CCJ at 2.71 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- AR’s quick ratio of 0.39 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas CCJ at 0.99 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
| Symbol | AR | CCJ |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.39 | 2.71 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.39 | 0.99 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.53 | 0.15 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 0.11 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 2.35 | 4.64 |