Seek Returns logo

APTV vs. HAS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APTV and HAS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAPTVHAS
Company NameAptiv PLCHasbro, Inc.
CountrySwitzerlandUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobile ComponentsLeisure Products
Market Capitalization16.36 billion USD11.18 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 17, 2011March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APTV and HAS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APTV vs. HAS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAPTVHAS
5-Day Price Return1.16%-1.07%
13-Week Price Return11.60%16.88%
26-Week Price Return13.16%32.27%
52-Week Price Return5.86%20.14%
Month-to-Date Return9.48%6.03%
Year-to-Date Return24.26%42.53%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.63M1.88M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.48M2.25M
3-Month Volatility33.73%23.99%
Beta1.550.62

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

APTV

11.15%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

APTV’s Return on Equity of 11.15% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HAS

-58.96%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
35.76%
Q3
21.83%
Median
14.83%
Q1
5.19%
Min
-14.10%

HAS has a negative Return on Equity of -58.96%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

APTV vs. HAS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

APTV

5.12%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

APTV’s Net Profit Margin of 5.12% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HAS

-13.37%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
13.45%
Q3
10.46%
Median
9.86%
Q1
4.71%
Min
-0.81%

HAS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -13.37%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

APTV vs. HAS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

APTV

6.35%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

APTV’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.35% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HAS

-8.06%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
15.65%
Q3
14.39%
Median
12.60%
Q1
8.85%
Min
2.80%

HAS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -8.06%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

APTV vs. HAS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPTVHAS
Return on Equity (TTM)11.15%-58.96%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.25%-9.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.12%-13.37%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.35%-8.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)19.11%65.02%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

APTV

1.76

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

APTV’s Current Ratio of 1.76 aligns with the median group of the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HAS

1.66

Leisure Products Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
3.37
Median
2.25
Q1
1.67
Min
1.12

HAS’s Current Ratio of 1.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Leisure Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

APTV vs. HAS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

APTV

0.80

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

APTV’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Automobile Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

HAS

13.77

Leisure Products Industry

Max
1.68
Q3
1.13
Median
0.29
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 13.77, HAS operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Leisure Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

APTV vs. HAS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

APTV

8.43

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

APTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.43 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HAS

5.34

Leisure Products Industry

Max
30.53
Q3
28.24
Median
14.76
Q1
5.23
Min
-6.13

HAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.34 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Leisure Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

APTV vs. HAS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPTVHAS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.761.66
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.221.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.8013.77
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.435.34

Growth

Revenue Growth

APTV vs. HAS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

APTV vs. HAS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

APTV

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

APTV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HAS

3.50%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.67%
Median
1.92%
Q1
1.26%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.50%, HAS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Leisure Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

APTV vs. HAS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

APTV

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

APTV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HAS

63.63%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
133.30%
Q3
85.97%
Median
68.01%
Q1
48.42%
Min
0.00%

HAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.63% is within the typical range for the Leisure Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

APTV vs. HAS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPTVHAS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.50%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%63.63%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

APTV

16.15

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

APTV’s P/E Ratio of 16.15 is within the middle range for the Automobile Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HAS

--

Leisure Products Industry

Max
39.62
Q3
29.98
Median
25.12
Q1
17.43
Min
10.66

P/E Ratio data for HAS is currently unavailable.

APTV vs. HAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

APTV

0.83

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

APTV’s P/S Ratio of 0.83 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobile Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HAS

2.63

Leisure Products Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.93
Median
1.67
Q1
1.14
Min
0.43

HAS’s P/S Ratio of 2.63 aligns with the market consensus for the Leisure Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

APTV vs. HAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

APTV

1.53

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

APTV’s P/B Ratio of 1.53 is in the upper tier for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

HAS

42.90

Leisure Products Industry

Max
7.37
Q3
4.91
Median
3.05
Q1
1.94
Min
1.37

At 42.90, HAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Leisure Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

APTV vs. HAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPTVHAS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.15--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.832.63
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.5342.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)9.8722.38