APP vs. MRVL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APP and MRVL, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
APP dominates in value with a market cap of 121.26 billion USD, eclipsing MRVL’s 51.92 billion USD by roughly 2.34×.
With betas of 2.39 for APP and 1.82 for MRVL, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | APP | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AppLovin Corporation | Marvell Technology, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Application | Semiconductors |
| CEO | Mr. Adam Arash Foroughi | Mr. Matthew J. Murphy |
| Price | 358.35 USD | 60.11 USD |
| Market Cap | 121.26 billion USD | 51.92 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.39 | 1.82 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | April 15, 2021 | June 30, 2000 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APP and MRVL over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of APP and MRVL based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- MRVL shows a negative P/E of -58.80, highlighting a year of losses, whereas APP at 63.43 trades on solid profitability.
- MRVL shows a negative forward PEG of -2.32, signaling expected earnings contraction, while APP at 2.43 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
| Symbol | APP | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 63.43 | -58.80 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.43 | -2.32 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 23.61 | 9.00 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 211.64 | 3.88 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 47.87 | 37.35 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 47.30 | -2221.67 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 24.23 | 9.59 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 49.12 | 39.79 |
Dividend Comparison
APP offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while MRVL provides a 0.40% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | APP | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.40% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APP and MRVL, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- APP is heavily leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 6.45), which can boost returns but raises risk if borrowing costs climb, while MRVL at 0.32 keeps leverage at a more moderate level.
- APP meets its interest obligations (ratio 7.41). In stark contrast, MRVL’s negative ratio (-3.75) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
| Symbol | APP | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 1.54 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 1.03 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 6.45 | 0.32 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.65 | 0.21 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 7.41 | -3.75 |