APP vs. HIMS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APP and HIMS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
APP dominates in value with a market cap of 121.26 billion USD, eclipsing HIMS’s 12.50 billion USD by roughly 9.70×.
With betas of 2.39 for APP and 1.85 for HIMS, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | APP | HIMS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AppLovin Corporation | Hims & Hers Health, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Consumer Defensive |
| Industry | Software - Application | Household & Personal Products |
| CEO | Mr. Adam Arash Foroughi | Mr. Andrew Dudum |
| Price | 358.35 USD | 58 USD |
| Market Cap | 121.26 billion USD | 12.50 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.39 | 1.85 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | April 15, 2021 | September 13, 2019 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APP and HIMS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between APP and HIMS, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | APP | HIMS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 63.43 | 78.32 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.43 | 2.07 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 23.61 | 7.00 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 211.64 | 23.44 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 47.87 | 52.02 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 47.30 | 99.09 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 24.23 | 6.89 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 49.12 | 51.15 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither APP nor HIMS currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | APP | HIMS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APP and HIMS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- APP is heavily leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 6.45), which can boost returns but raises risk if borrowing costs climb, while HIMS at 0.12 keeps leverage at a more moderate level.
- APP (at 7.41) covers its interest payments, while HIMS shows “--” for minimal debt service.
| Symbol | APP | HIMS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 1.59 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 1.32 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 6.45 | 0.12 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.65 | 0.07 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 7.41 | -- |