APP vs. BAC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APP and BAC, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
BAC stands out with 325.75 billion USD in market value—about 2.69× APP’s market cap of 121.26 billion USD.
APP’s beta of 2.39 points to much larger expected swings compared to BAC’s calmer 1.28, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | APP | BAC |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AppLovin Corporation | Bank of America Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Financial Services |
| Industry | Software - Application | Banks - Diversified |
| CEO | Mr. Adam Arash Foroughi | Mr. Brian Thomas Moynihan |
| Price | 358.35 USD | 43.25 USD |
| Market Cap | 121.26 billion USD | 325.75 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.39 | 1.28 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | April 15, 2021 | February 21, 1973 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APP and BAC over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between APP and BAC, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | APP | BAC |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 63.43 | 11.92 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.43 | 0.80 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 23.61 | 2.65 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 211.64 | 1.12 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 47.87 | 48.37 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 47.30 | 15.23 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 24.23 | 6.29 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 49.12 | 114.95 |
Dividend Comparison
APP offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while BAC provides a 2.36% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | APP | BAC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 2.36% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APP and BAC, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- BAC’s current ratio of 0.66 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas APP at 1.68 maintains healthy liquidity.
- BAC posts a quick ratio of 0.66, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while APP at 1.68 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- APP is heavily leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 6.45), which can boost returns but raises risk if borrowing costs climb, while BAC at 2.44 keeps leverage at a more moderate level.
- BAC’s low interest coverage (0.36) means it doesn't cover interest from operating earnings. APP (at 7.41) meets its interest obligations.
| Symbol | APP | BAC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 0.66 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 0.66 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 6.45 | 2.44 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.65 | 0.22 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 7.41 | 0.36 |