Seek Returns logo

APO vs. RKT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APO and RKT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

APO’s market capitalization of 82.56 billion USD is substantially larger than RKT’s 28.48 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.57 for APO and 2.28 for RKT, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAPORKT
Company NameApollo Global Management, Inc.Rocket Companies, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryAsset Management - GlobalFinancial - Mortgages
CEOMarc Jeffrey RowanVarun Krishna
Price144.47 USD14.24 USD
Market Cap82.56 billion USD28.48 billion USD
Beta1.572.28
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMarch 30, 2011August 6, 2020
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APO and RKT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APO vs. RKT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

APO

21.02%

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
21.02%
Q3
10.69%
Median
0.36%
Q1
-9.97%
Min
-20.30%

In the upper quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry, APO’s Return on Equity of 21.02% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

RKT

0.43%

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
13.67%
Q3
8.34%
Median
5.17%
Q1
1.25%
Min
0.43%

RKT’s Return on Equity of 0.43% is in the lower quartile for the Financial - Mortgages industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

APO vs. RKT: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Asset Management - Global and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

APO

5.75%

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
5.75%
Q3
2.40%
Median
-0.94%
Q1
-4.29%
Min
-7.64%

In the upper quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry, APO’s Return on Invested Capital of 5.75% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

RKT

0.53%

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
5.70%
Q3
5.19%
Median
3.06%
Q1
1.74%
Min
0.53%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Financial - Mortgages industry.

APO vs. RKT: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Asset Management - Global and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

APO

14.59%

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
14.59%
Q3
-4.29%
Median
-23.18%
Q1
-42.06%
Min
-60.94%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.59% places APO in the upper quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RKT

0.05%

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
23.74%
Q3
12.13%
Median
3.31%
Q1
0.50%
Min
-8.40%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial - Mortgages industry, RKT’s Net Profit Margin of 0.05% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

APO vs. RKT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Asset Management - Global and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

APO

29.75%

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
29.75%
Q3
12.31%
Median
-5.13%
Q1
-22.57%
Min
-40.02%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.75% places APO in the upper quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

RKT

2.89%

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
52.12%
Q3
29.77%
Median
12.64%
Q1
9.22%
Min
2.89%

In the Financial - Mortgages industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

APO vs. RKT: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Asset Management - Global and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPORKT
Return on Equity (TTM)21.02%0.43%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.91%0.01%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)5.75%0.53%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.59%0.05%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.75%2.89%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)91.14%90.49%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

APO

0.80

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
1.36
Q3
1.22
Median
1.08
Q1
0.94
Min
0.80

APO’s Current Ratio of 0.80 falls into the lower quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RKT

0.43

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
1.28
Median
0.56
Q1
0.42
Min
0.18

For the Financial - Mortgages industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

APO vs. RKT: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

APO

0.59

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
0.59
Q3
0.47
Median
0.34
Q1
0.22
Min
0.09

APO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Asset Management - Global industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

RKT

25.35

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
28.70
Q3
26.19
Median
12.98
Q1
1.97
Min
0.28

RKT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 25.35 is typical for the Financial - Mortgages industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

APO vs. RKT: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

APO

21.30

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
21.30
Q3
14.75
Median
8.19
Q1
1.64
Min
-4.91

APO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 21.30 is in the upper quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

RKT

0.30

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
1.23
Median
0.75
Q1
0.30
Min
0.30

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial - Mortgages industry.

APO vs. RKT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Asset Management - Global and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPORKT
Current Ratio (TTM)0.800.43
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.800.43
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.5925.35
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.030.59
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-0.3551.64
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)21.300.30

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for APO and RKT. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

APO vs. RKT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

APO vs. RKT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

APO vs. RKT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

APO

1.31%

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
1.33%
Q3
1.00%
Median
0.66%
Q1
0.33%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.31%, APO offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Asset Management - Global industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

RKT

5.62%

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
9.76%
Q3
3.44%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.62%, RKT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Financial - Mortgages industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

APO vs. RKT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Asset Management - Global and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

APO

33.63%

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

APO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.63%, but industry benchmark data for the Asset Management - Global sector is unavailable for comparison.

RKT

0.00%

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
809.09%
Q3
90.46%
Median
3.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RKT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

APO vs. RKT: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPORKT
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.31%5.62%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)33.63%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

APO

23.62

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

APO has a P/E Ratio of 23.62, but a direct industry comparison is not possible as benchmark data for the Asset Management - Global sector is unavailable.

RKT

758.84

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
27.35
Q3
24.60
Median
19.38
Q1
13.85
Min
9.11

At 758.84, RKT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial - Mortgages industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

APO vs. RKT: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

APO

-0.24

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

APO has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -0.24. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

RKT

16.55

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
3.27
Q3
1.67
Median
0.90
Q1
0.60
Min
0.34

RKT’s Forward PEG Ratio of 16.55 is exceptionally high for the Financial - Mortgages industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

APO vs. RKT: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

APO

3.35

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
5.92
Q3
5.27
Median
4.62
Q1
3.97
Min
3.32

In the lower quartile for the Asset Management - Global industry, APO’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

RKT

5.62

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
5.61
Q3
3.48
Median
1.83
Q1
0.79
Min
0.28

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial - Mortgages industry.

APO vs. RKT: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

APO

4.72

Asset Management - Global Industry

Max
4.67
Q3
3.65
Median
2.63
Q1
1.61
Min
0.59

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Asset Management - Global industry.

RKT

3.60

Financial - Mortgages Industry

Max
1.94
Q3
1.80
Median
1.23
Q1
1.05
Min
0.58

At 3.60, RKT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial - Mortgages industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

APO vs. RKT: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Asset Management - Global and Financial - Mortgages industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPORKT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)23.62758.84
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-0.2416.55
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.355.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.723.60
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)23.24-22.66
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)10.22161.45
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.248.26