APO vs. MSCI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APO and MSCI, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
APO dominates in value with a market cap of 74.68 billion USD, eclipsing MSCI’s 43.34 billion USD by roughly 1.72×.
With betas of 1.65 for APO and 1.33 for MSCI, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | APO | MSCI |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Apollo Global Management, Inc. | MSCI Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Asset Management - Global | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| CEO | Mr. Marc Jeffrey Rowan | Mr. Henry A. Fernandez |
| Price | 130.68 USD | 560.1 USD |
| Market Cap | 74.68 billion USD | 43.34 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.65 | 1.33 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 30, 2011 | November 15, 2007 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APO and MSCI over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of APO and MSCI based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- APO posts a negative forward PEG of -0.21, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas MSCI at 3.23 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
- MSCI carries a sub-zero price-to-book ratio of -45.36, indicating negative equity. In contrast, APO (P/B 4.27) has positive book value.
| Symbol | APO | MSCI |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 21.36 | 38.08 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -0.21 | 3.23 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.03 | 14.83 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 4.27 | -45.36 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 21.02 | 30.02 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 9.21 | 26.63 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 2.92 | 16.30 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 20.25 | 33.00 |
Dividend Comparison
Both APO and MSCI offer similar dividend yields (1.45% vs. 1.21%), indicating comparable approaches to balancing income and growth.
| Symbol | APO | MSCI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.45% | 1.21% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APO and MSCI, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.80 and 0.84, both APO and MSCI have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- APO’s quick ratio of 0.80 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas MSCI at 0.84 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- MSCI has negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -4.87), suggesting asset shortfalls, whereas APO at 0.59 preserves healthier equity coverage.
- MSCI carries a debt-to-assets ratio of 0.87, suggesting substantial asset funding via debt, while APO at 0.03 opts for a more conservative financing structure.
| Symbol | APO | MSCI |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.80 | 0.84 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.80 | 0.84 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.59 | -4.87 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.03 | 0.87 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.30 | 8.46 |