APO vs. MS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APO and MS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
MS stands out with 201.02 billion USD in market value—about 2.69× APO’s market cap of 74.68 billion USD.
With betas of 1.65 for APO and 1.30 for MS, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | APO | MS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Apollo Global Management, Inc. | Morgan Stanley |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Asset Management - Global | Financial - Capital Markets |
| CEO | Mr. Marc Jeffrey Rowan | Mr. Edward N. Pick |
| Price | 130.68 USD | 125.3 USD |
| Market Cap | 74.68 billion USD | 201.02 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.65 | 1.30 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 30, 2011 | February 23, 1993 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APO and MS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of APO and MS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- APO posts a negative forward PEG of -0.21, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas MS at 1.97 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
- MS reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -95.72, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while APO at 21.02 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | APO | MS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 21.36 | 13.89 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -0.21 | 1.97 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.03 | 1.90 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 4.27 | 1.90 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 21.02 | -95.72 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 9.21 | 20.41 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 2.92 | 4.60 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 20.25 | -231.32 |
Dividend Comparison
MS stands out with a 2.95% dividend yield—around 103% above APO’s 1.45%—highlighting its emphasis on generous payouts.
| Symbol | APO | MS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.45% | 2.95% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APO and MS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.80 and 0.66, both APO and MS have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both APO (quick ratio 0.80) and MS (quick ratio 0.66) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
- MS is highly leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 3.45), elevating both potential gains and risks, compared to APO at 0.59, which maintains a steadier capital structure.
- MS’s low interest coverage (0.41) means it doesn't cover interest from operating earnings. APO (at 21.30) meets its interest obligations.
| Symbol | APO | MS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.80 | 0.66 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.80 | 0.66 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.59 | 3.45 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.03 | 0.30 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.30 | 0.41 |