APO vs. MARA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

APO dominates in value with a market cap of 74.68 billion USD, eclipsing MARA’s 5.57 billion USD by roughly 13.40×.

MARA carries a higher beta at 6.84, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while APO remains steadier at 1.65.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of APO and MARA over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of APO and MARA based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

• MARA shows a negative P/E of -16.56, highlighting a year of losses, whereas APO at 21.36 trades on solid profitability.
• APO posts a negative forward PEG of -0.21, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas MARA at 0.88 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
• MARA reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -4.53, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while APO at 21.02 maintains positive cash flow.

Dividend Comparison

APO delivers a 1.45% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas MARA appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of APO and MARA, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

• With current ratios of 0.80 and 0.79, both APO and MARA have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
• Both APO (quick ratio 0.80) and MARA (quick ratio 0.79) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
• APO meets its interest obligations (ratio 21.30). In stark contrast, MARA’s negative ratio (-27.89) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.