APO vs. LPLA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APO and LPLA, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
APO dominates in value with a market cap of 74.68 billion USD, eclipsing LPLA’s 30.23 billion USD by roughly 2.47×.
APO’s beta of 1.65 points to much larger expected swings compared to LPLA’s calmer 0.64, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | APO | LPLA |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Apollo Global Management, Inc. | LPL Financial Holdings Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Asset Management - Global | Financial - Capital Markets |
| CEO | Mr. Marc Jeffrey Rowan | Mr. Richard Steinmeier |
| Price | 130.68 USD | 377.95 USD |
| Market Cap | 74.68 billion USD | 30.23 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.65 | 0.64 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 30, 2011 | November 18, 2010 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APO and LPLA over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of APO and LPLA based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- APO posts a negative forward PEG of -0.21, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas LPLA at 1.25 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
- LPLA reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -89.81, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while APO at 21.02 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | APO | LPLA |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 21.36 | 25.90 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -0.21 | 1.25 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.03 | 2.29 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 4.27 | 9.03 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 21.02 | -89.81 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 9.21 | 12.08 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 2.92 | 2.19 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 20.25 | -86.16 |
Dividend Comparison
APO’s dividend yield of 1.45% is about 510% higher than LPLA’s 0.24%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | APO | LPLA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.45% | 0.24% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APO and LPLA, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.80 and 0.00, both APO and LPLA have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both APO (quick ratio 0.80) and LPLA (quick ratio 0.00) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
| Symbol | APO | LPLA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.80 | 0.00 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.80 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.59 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.03 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.30 | 4.93 |