APO vs. KKR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APO and KKR, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With APO at 74.68 billion USD and KKR at 104.88 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
With betas of 1.65 for APO and 1.91 for KKR, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | APO | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Apollo Global Management, Inc. | KKR & Co. Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Asset Management - Global | Asset Management |
| CEO | Mr. Marc Jeffrey Rowan | Mr. Joseph Y. Bae |
| Price | 130.68 USD | 117.76 USD |
| Market Cap | 74.68 billion USD | 104.88 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.65 | 1.91 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 30, 2011 | July 15, 2010 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APO and KKR over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of APO and KKR based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- APO posts a negative forward PEG of -0.21, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas KKR at 1.94 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
| Symbol | APO | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 21.36 | 47.37 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -0.21 | 1.94 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.03 | 6.95 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 4.27 | 3.81 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 21.02 | 13.93 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 9.21 | 16.22 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 2.92 | 9.12 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 20.25 | 18.29 |
Dividend Comparison
APO’s dividend yield of 1.45% is about 141% higher than KKR’s 0.60%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | APO | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.45% | 0.60% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APO and KKR, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- APO’s current ratio of 0.80 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while KKR at 4.11 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- APO’s quick ratio of 0.80 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas KKR at 4.11 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- APO meets its interest obligations (ratio 21.30). In stark contrast, KKR’s negative ratio (-0.04) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
| Symbol | APO | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.80 | 4.11 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.80 | 4.11 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.59 | 1.85 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.03 | 0.14 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.30 | -0.04 |