APO vs. JPM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APO and JPM, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
JPM stands out with 725.45 billion USD in market value—about 9.71× APO’s market cap of 74.68 billion USD.
APO’s beta of 1.65 points to much larger expected swings compared to JPM’s calmer 1.07, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | APO | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Apollo Global Management, Inc. | JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Asset Management - Global | Banks - Diversified |
| CEO | Mr. Marc Jeffrey Rowan | Mr. James Dimon |
| Price | 130.68 USD | 261.04 USD |
| Market Cap | 74.68 billion USD | 725.45 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.65 | 1.07 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 30, 2011 | March 17, 1980 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APO and JPM over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of APO and JPM based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- APO posts a negative forward PEG of -0.21, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas JPM at 1.79 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
- JPM reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -122.34, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while APO at 21.02 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | APO | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 21.36 | 12.33 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -0.21 | 1.79 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.03 | 3.55 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 4.27 | 2.09 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 21.02 | -122.34 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 9.21 | 15.68 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 2.92 | 6.38 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 20.25 | -220.03 |
Dividend Comparison
Both APO and JPM offer similar dividend yields (1.45% vs. 1.93%), indicating comparable approaches to balancing income and growth.
| Symbol | APO | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.45% | 1.93% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APO and JPM, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.80 and 0.58, both APO and JPM have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both APO (quick ratio 0.80) and JPM (quick ratio 0.58) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
| Symbol | APO | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.80 | 0.58 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.80 | 0.58 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.59 | 2.86 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.03 | 0.23 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.30 | 1.34 |