Seek Returns logo

APLD vs. FUTU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APLD and FUTU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

APLD is a standard domestic listing, while FUTU trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolAPLDFUTU
Company NameApplied Digital CorporationFutu Holdings Limited
CountryUnited StatesHong Kong
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustrySoftwareCapital Markets
Market Capitalization4.11 billion USD24.87 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGM
Listing DateApril 13, 2022March 8, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APLD and FUTU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APLD vs. FUTU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAPLDFUTU
5-Day Price Return8.04%2.24%
13-Week Price Return130.50%63.01%
26-Week Price Return98.74%51.51%
52-Week Price Return282.48%185.76%
Month-to-Date Return19.63%16.25%
Year-to-Date Return105.76%123.35%
10-Day Avg. Volume28.79M2.30M
3-Month Avg. Volume46.81M2.44M
3-Month Volatility149.11%58.08%
Beta6.560.53

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

APLD

-48.16%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

APLD has a negative Return on Equity of -48.16%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FUTU

23.06%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
21.61%
Median
13.77%
Q1
8.31%
Min
-4.25%

In the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, FUTU’s Return on Equity of 23.06% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

APLD vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

APLD

-109.85%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

APLD has a negative Net Profit Margin of -109.85%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FUTU

40.05%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
66.67%
Q3
35.11%
Median
23.49%
Q1
13.63%
Min
-15.18%

A Net Profit Margin of 40.05% places FUTU in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

APLD vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

APLD

-37.26%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

APLD has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -37.26%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

FUTU

48.72%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
86.40%
Q3
46.46%
Median
32.80%
Q1
18.32%
Min
-21.87%

An Operating Profit Margin of 48.72% places FUTU in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

APLD vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPLDFUTU
Return on Equity (TTM)-48.16%23.06%
Return on Assets (TTM)-15.26%4.34%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-109.85%40.05%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-37.26%48.72%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)5.58%82.01%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

APLD

0.77

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

APLD’s Current Ratio of 0.77 falls into the lower quartile for the Software industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FUTU

1.18

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
1.89
Median
1.01
Q1
0.54
Min
-0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

APLD vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

APLD

1.11

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

APLD’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.11. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FUTU

0.36

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.62
Q3
2.84
Median
1.02
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

APLD vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

APLD

-9.74

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

APLD has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -9.74. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FUTU

4,725.16

Capital Markets Industry

Max
126.03
Q3
60.98
Median
11.77
Q1
4.95
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

APLD vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPLDFUTU
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.771.18
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.751.18
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.110.36
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-9.744,725.16

Growth

Revenue Growth

APLD vs. FUTU: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

APLD vs. FUTU: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

APLD

0.06%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.06%, APLD offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Software industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

FUTU

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.26%
Q3
4.86%
Median
2.78%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

FUTU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

APLD vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

APLD

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

APLD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FUTU

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
200.72%
Q3
101.92%
Median
57.97%
Q1
32.36%
Min
0.00%

FUTU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

APLD vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPLDFUTU
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.06%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

APLD

--

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

P/E Ratio data for APLD is currently unavailable.

FUTU

8.94

Capital Markets Industry

Max
58.89
Q3
31.00
Median
18.54
Q1
12.09
Min
5.24

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, FUTU’s P/E Ratio of 8.94 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

APLD vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

APLD

18.46

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

APLD’s P/S Ratio of 18.46 is in the upper echelon for the Software industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FUTU

4.31

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.49
Q3
7.41
Median
4.68
Q1
2.25
Min
0.04

FUTU’s P/S Ratio of 4.31 aligns with the market consensus for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

APLD vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

APLD

3.60

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

APLD’s P/B Ratio of 3.60 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FUTU

2.50

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.48
Q3
4.94
Median
2.42
Q1
1.21
Min
0.38

FUTU’s P/B Ratio of 2.50 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

APLD vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPLDFUTU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--8.94
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)18.464.31
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.602.50
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15,706.282.87