Seek Returns logo

APH vs. ZBRA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APH and ZBRA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

APH’s market capitalization of 120.31 billion USD is substantially larger than ZBRA’s 16.46 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

ZBRA carries a higher beta at 1.75, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while APH (beta: 1.13) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAPHZBRA
Company NameAmphenol CorporationZebra Technologies Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryHardware, Equipment & PartsCommunication Equipment
CEORichard Adam NorwittWilliam J. Burns
Price99.46 USD323.72 USD
Market Cap120.31 billion USD16.46 billion USD
Beta1.131.75
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateNovember 8, 1991August 15, 1991
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APH and ZBRA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APH vs. ZBRA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

APH

27.13%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
38.64%
Q3
17.03%
Median
8.95%
Q1
1.23%
Min
-14.34%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, APH’s Return on Equity of 27.13% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ZBRA

15.78%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.07%
Q3
8.07%
Median
1.84%
Q1
-11.93%
Min
-31.65%

In the upper quartile for the Communication Equipment industry, ZBRA’s Return on Equity of 15.78% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

APH vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

APH

15.20%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
17.24%
Q3
9.87%
Median
6.54%
Q1
1.56%
Min
-7.50%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, APH’s Return on Invested Capital of 15.20% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

ZBRA

10.15%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
11.59%
Q3
6.61%
Median
2.97%
Q1
-2.58%
Min
-13.18%

In the upper quartile for the Communication Equipment industry, ZBRA’s Return on Invested Capital of 10.15% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

APH vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

APH

15.58%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
22.76%
Q3
11.04%
Median
3.80%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-8.57%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.58% places APH in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ZBRA

10.75%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
9.21%
Median
2.46%
Q1
-8.56%
Min
-29.87%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.75% places ZBRA in the upper quartile for the Communication Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

APH vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

APH

21.26%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
25.25%
Q3
13.73%
Median
8.22%
Q1
4.35%
Min
-0.79%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.26% places APH in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ZBRA

15.21%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.72%
Q3
11.64%
Median
5.79%
Q1
-2.28%
Min
-18.20%

An Operating Profit Margin of 15.21% places ZBRA in the upper quartile for the Communication Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

APH vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPHZBRA
Return on Equity (TTM)27.13%15.78%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.41%6.95%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)15.20%10.15%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.58%10.75%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.26%15.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.94%48.25%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

APH

1.99

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
4.10
Q3
3.23
Median
2.37
Q1
1.81
Min
0.58

APH’s Current Ratio of 1.99 aligns with the median group of the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ZBRA

1.45

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
2.59
Median
1.62
Q1
1.32
Min
0.86

ZBRA’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Communication Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

APH vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

APH

0.70

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
1.19
Q3
0.56
Median
0.33
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

APH’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.70. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ZBRA

0.65

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
1.82
Q3
1.00
Median
0.53
Q1
0.20
Min
0.02

ZBRA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.65 is typical for the Communication Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

APH vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

APH

13.97

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
28.37
Q3
14.25
Median
9.35
Q1
2.86
Min
-13.16

APH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ZBRA

14.39

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
16.12
Q3
9.22
Median
2.52
Q1
-0.75
Min
-12.07

ZBRA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.39 is in the upper quartile for the Communication Equipment industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

APH vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPHZBRA
Current Ratio (TTM)1.991.45
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.361.02
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.700.65
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.310.30
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.291.52
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.9714.39

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for APH and ZBRA. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

APH vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

APH vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

APH vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

APH

0.66%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
2.16%
Q3
0.66%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.66%, APH offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ZBRA

0.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
4.72%
Q3
0.38%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZBRA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

APH vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

APH

25.37%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
71.55%
Q3
25.37%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

APH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.37% is within the typical range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ZBRA

0.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
91.96%
Q3
26.44%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZBRA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

APH vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPHZBRA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.66%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)25.37%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

APH

46.05

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
86.58
Q3
53.54
Median
36.07
Q1
25.99
Min
12.16

APH’s P/E Ratio of 46.05 is within the middle range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ZBRA

30.29

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
44.37
Q3
41.98
Median
30.61
Q1
23.44
Min
2.14

ZBRA’s P/E Ratio of 30.29 is within the middle range for the Communication Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

APH vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

APH

4.55

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
5.22
Q3
3.27
Median
2.16
Q1
1.77
Min
0.00

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry.

ZBRA

1.48

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
15.97
Q3
6.99
Median
2.78
Q1
0.66
Min
0.05

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Communication Equipment industry.

APH vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

APH

7.17

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.95
Median
2.45
Q1
1.17
Min
0.32

APH’s P/S Ratio of 7.17 is in the upper echelon for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ZBRA

3.22

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.88
Median
2.17
Q1
1.15
Min
0.37

ZBRA’s P/S Ratio of 3.22 aligns with the market consensus for the Communication Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

APH vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

APH

11.68

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
7.53
Q3
4.63
Median
3.34
Q1
2.35
Min
0.48

At 11.68, APH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ZBRA

4.59

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
14.42
Q3
7.01
Median
3.09
Q1
1.38
Min
0.41

ZBRA’s P/B Ratio of 4.59 is within the conventional range for the Communication Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

APH vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPHZBRA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)46.0530.29
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)4.551.48
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.173.22
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)11.684.59
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)54.1116.45
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)29.5318.39
EV-to-Sales (TTM)7.503.51