Seek Returns logo

APH vs. NTES: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APH and NTES, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

APH’s market capitalization stands at 120.31 billion USD, while NTES’s is 84.47 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

With betas of 1.13 for APH and 0.85 for NTES, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

NTES is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. APH, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolAPHNTES
Company NameAmphenol CorporationNetEase, Inc.
CountryUSCN
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryHardware, Equipment & PartsElectronic Gaming & Multimedia
CEORichard Adam NorwittLei Ding
Price99.46 USD132.85 USD
Market Cap120.31 billion USD84.47 billion USD
Beta1.130.85
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateNovember 8, 1991June 30, 2000
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APH and NTES by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APH vs. NTES: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

APH

27.13%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
38.64%
Q3
17.03%
Median
8.95%
Q1
1.23%
Min
-14.34%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, APH’s Return on Equity of 27.13% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

NTES

23.73%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
22.45%
Q3
13.61%
Median
-5.53%
Q1
-70.13%
Min
-121.78%

NTES’s Return on Equity of 23.73% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

APH vs. NTES: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

APH

15.20%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
17.24%
Q3
9.87%
Median
6.54%
Q1
1.56%
Min
-7.50%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, APH’s Return on Invested Capital of 15.20% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

NTES

17.02%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
17.62%
Q3
11.24%
Median
1.98%
Q1
-22.67%
Min
-64.64%

In the upper quartile for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry, NTES’s Return on Invested Capital of 17.02% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

APH vs. NTES: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

APH

15.58%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
22.76%
Q3
11.04%
Median
3.80%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-8.57%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.58% places APH in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NTES

30.17%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
28.20%
Q3
16.08%
Median
10.20%
Q1
-7.35%
Min
-22.94%

NTES’s Net Profit Margin of 30.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

APH vs. NTES: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

APH

21.26%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
25.25%
Q3
13.73%
Median
8.22%
Q1
4.35%
Min
-0.79%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.26% places APH in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

NTES

30.21%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
28.10%
Q3
17.15%
Median
5.89%
Q1
-19.43%
Min
-26.48%

NTES’s Operating Profit Margin of 30.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

APH vs. NTES: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPHNTES
Return on Equity (TTM)27.13%23.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.41%16.11%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)15.20%17.02%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.58%30.17%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.26%30.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.94%62.71%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

APH

1.99

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
4.10
Q3
3.23
Median
2.37
Q1
1.81
Min
0.58

APH’s Current Ratio of 1.99 aligns with the median group of the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NTES

3.21

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
2.77
Median
1.19
Q1
0.82
Min
0.01

NTES’s Current Ratio of 3.21 is in the upper quartile for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

APH vs. NTES: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

APH

0.70

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
1.19
Q3
0.56
Median
0.33
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

APH’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.70. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

NTES

0.07

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
1.14
Median
0.31
Q1
0.17
Min
0.09

At 0.07, NTES’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio is unusually low for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This highlights a conservative capital structure, suggesting the company prioritizes financial stability over aggressive growth funded by debt.

APH vs. NTES: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

APH

13.97

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
28.37
Q3
14.25
Median
9.35
Q1
2.86
Min
-13.16

APH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

NTES

--

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
20.61
Q3
4.69
Median
-1.31
Q1
-20.23
Min
-25.09

Interest Coverage Ratio data for NTES is currently unavailable.

APH vs. NTES: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPHNTES
Current Ratio (TTM)1.993.21
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.363.20
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.700.07
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.310.05
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.29-0.92
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.97--

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for APH and NTES. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

APH vs. NTES: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

APH vs. NTES: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

APH vs. NTES: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

APH

0.66%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
2.16%
Q3
0.66%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.66%, APH offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

NTES

1.49%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
8.44%
Q3
0.36%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.49%, NTES offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

APH vs. NTES: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

APH

25.37%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
71.55%
Q3
25.37%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

APH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.37% is within the typical range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

NTES

36.47%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
106.44%
Q3
13.31%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTES’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.47% is in the upper quartile for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

APH vs. NTES: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPHNTES
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.66%1.49%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)25.37%36.47%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

APH

46.05

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
86.58
Q3
53.54
Median
36.07
Q1
25.99
Min
12.16

APH’s P/E Ratio of 46.05 is within the middle range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NTES

18.79

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
36.87
Q3
20.95
Median
12.73
Q1
7.31
Min
3.67

NTES’s P/E Ratio of 18.79 is within the middle range for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

APH vs. NTES: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

APH

4.55

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
5.22
Q3
3.27
Median
2.16
Q1
1.77
Min
0.00

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry.

NTES

2.72

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
2.24
Median
1.87
Q1
1.76
Min
1.76

A Forward PEG Ratio of 2.72 places NTES in the upper quartile for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

APH vs. NTES: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

APH

7.17

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.95
Median
2.45
Q1
1.17
Min
0.32

APH’s P/S Ratio of 7.17 is in the upper echelon for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

NTES

5.68

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
7.60
Q3
6.29
Median
3.76
Q1
1.02
Min
0.66

NTES’s P/S Ratio of 5.68 aligns with the market consensus for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

APH vs. NTES: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

APH

11.68

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
7.53
Q3
4.63
Median
3.34
Q1
2.35
Min
0.48

At 11.68, APH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NTES

4.23

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
6.47
Q3
6.47
Median
4.48
Q1
1.29
Min
0.36

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry.

APH vs. NTES: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPHNTES
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)46.0518.79
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)4.552.72
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.175.68
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)11.684.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)54.1115.23
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)29.5316.61
EV-to-Sales (TTM)7.505.38