Seek Returns logo

APH vs. MU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APH and MU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

APH’s market capitalization stands at 120.31 billion USD, while MU’s is 136.67 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

With betas of 1.13 for APH and 1.28 for MU, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAPHMU
Company NameAmphenol CorporationMicron Technology, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryHardware, Equipment & PartsSemiconductors
CEORichard Adam NorwittSanjay Mehrotra
Price99.46 USD122.29 USD
Market Cap120.31 billion USD136.67 billion USD
Beta1.131.28
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateNovember 8, 1991June 1, 1984
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APH and MU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APH vs. MU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

APH

27.13%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
38.64%
Q3
17.03%
Median
8.95%
Q1
1.23%
Min
-14.34%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, APH’s Return on Equity of 27.13% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MU

13.02%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

MU’s Return on Equity of 13.02% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

APH vs. MU: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

APH

15.20%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
17.24%
Q3
9.87%
Median
6.54%
Q1
1.56%
Min
-7.50%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, APH’s Return on Invested Capital of 15.20% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

MU

11.32%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

MU’s Return on Invested Capital of 11.32% is in line with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

APH vs. MU: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

APH

15.58%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
22.76%
Q3
11.04%
Median
3.80%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-8.57%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.58% places APH in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MU

18.41%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

MU’s Net Profit Margin of 18.41% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

APH vs. MU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

APH

21.26%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
25.25%
Q3
13.73%
Median
8.22%
Q1
4.35%
Min
-0.79%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.26% places APH in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MU

22.59%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.59% places MU in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

APH vs. MU: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPHMU
Return on Equity (TTM)27.13%13.02%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.41%7.94%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)15.20%11.32%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.58%18.41%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.26%22.59%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.94%37.13%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

APH

1.99

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
4.10
Q3
3.23
Median
2.37
Q1
1.81
Min
0.58

APH’s Current Ratio of 1.99 aligns with the median group of the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MU

2.75

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

MU’s Current Ratio of 2.75 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

APH vs. MU: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

APH

0.70

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
1.19
Q3
0.56
Median
0.33
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

APH’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.70. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MU

0.31

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

MU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.31 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

APH vs. MU: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

APH

13.97

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
28.37
Q3
14.25
Median
9.35
Q1
2.86
Min
-13.16

APH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MU

31.43

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

MU’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 31.43 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

APH vs. MU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPHMU
Current Ratio (TTM)1.992.75
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.361.89
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.700.31
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.310.20
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.290.46
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.9731.43

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for APH and MU. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

APH vs. MU: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

APH vs. MU: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

APH vs. MU: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

APH

0.66%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
2.16%
Q3
0.66%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.66%, APH offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MU

0.38%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MU’s Dividend Yield of 0.38% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

APH vs. MU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

APH

25.37%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
71.55%
Q3
25.37%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

APH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.37% is within the typical range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MU

8.37%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MU’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 8.37% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

APH vs. MU: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPHMU
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.66%0.38%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)25.37%8.37%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

APH

46.05

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
86.58
Q3
53.54
Median
36.07
Q1
25.99
Min
12.16

APH’s P/E Ratio of 46.05 is within the middle range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MU

21.96

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

MU’s P/E Ratio of 21.96 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

APH vs. MU: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

APH

4.55

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
5.22
Q3
3.27
Median
2.16
Q1
1.77
Min
0.00

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry.

MU

0.82

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

APH vs. MU: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

APH

7.17

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.95
Median
2.45
Q1
1.17
Min
0.32

APH’s P/S Ratio of 7.17 is in the upper echelon for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MU

4.04

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

MU’s P/S Ratio of 4.04 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

APH vs. MU: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

APH

11.68

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
7.53
Q3
4.63
Median
3.34
Q1
2.35
Min
0.48

At 11.68, APH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MU

2.69

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

MU’s P/B Ratio of 2.69 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

APH vs. MU: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPHMU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)46.0521.96
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)4.550.82
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.174.04
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)11.682.69
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)54.1111.31
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)29.5311.97
EV-to-Sales (TTM)7.504.20