APH vs. CRWV: Amphenol vs. CoreWeave Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Amphenol (APH) and CoreWeave (CRWV) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Amphenol (APH) and CoreWeave (CRWV) share the Information Technology sector but sit in different industry groups — APH in Technology Hardware & Equipment and CRWV in Software & Services.

Amphenol (APH) carries decades of public-market history since November 8, 1991, while CoreWeave (CRWV) listed on March 28, 2025 — long-window comparisons have far more historical data on the APH side.

Company profile comparison for Amphenol (APH) and CoreWeave (CRWV)
Profile Item	APH	CRWV
Name	Amphenol Corp. Class A Common Stock	CoreWeave Inc. Class A Common Stock
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Information Technology	Information Technology
GICS Industry Group	Technology Hardware & Equipment	Software & Services
GICS Industry	Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components	IT Services
GICS Sub-Industry	Electronic Components	Internet Services & Infrastructure
Market Capitalization	184.18 billion USD	25.59 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	Nasdaq
Listing Date	November 8, 1991	March 28, 2025
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

APH

CRWV

GSPC

Amphenol (APH) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Amphenol (APH) and CoreWeave (CRWV). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Amphenol (APH) and CoreWeave (CRWV). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Amphenol (APH) and CoreWeave (CRWV)
Metric	APH	CRWV
Total Return (1Y)	15.56%	-52.69%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	56.62%	--
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	32.33%	--

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

APH

CRWV

GSPC

Amphenol (APH) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Amphenol (APH) and CoreWeave (CRWV). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

CoreWeave (CRWV) carries a highly aggressive beta of 7.43, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Amphenol (APH) is closer to market-like at 1.27 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk profile metrics for Amphenol (APH) and CoreWeave (CRWV)
Metric	APH	CRWV
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	48.51%	98.61%
Beta (5Y)	1.27	7.43
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-28.73%	-76.22%
Avg. Volume (3M)	12.40M	40.98M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

APH and CRWV are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. Each dashed Capital Allocation Line uses that stock's own industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Amphenol (APH) and CoreWeave (CRWV)
Metric	APH	CRWV
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.23	-0.58
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	0.32	-0.86

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

CoreWeave (CRWV) reports a negative ROE of -43.60%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Amphenol (APH) reports 40.08%, ranking against industry peers normally.

APH

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

40.08%

Max: 42.47%
APH: 40.08%
Q3: 19.13%
Median: 11.00%
Q1: 1.63%
Min: -20.62%

CRWV

Software & Services industry group

-43.60%

Max: 53.85%
Q3: 17.90%
Median: 6.59%
Q1: -9.59%
CRWV: -43.60%
Min: -50.52%

Amphenol (APH) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV): A comparison of their ROE against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Software & Services industry group benchmarks.

Net Margin (TTM)

CoreWeave (CRWV) reports a negative net margin of -25.40%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Amphenol (APH) reports 17.95%, ranking against industry peers normally.

APH

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

17.95%

Max: 27.60%
APH: 17.95%
Q3: 11.66%
Median: 4.08%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -11.02%

CRWV

Software & Services industry group

-25.40%

Max: 41.17%
Q3: 15.28%
Median: 4.63%
Q1: -5.42%
CRWV: -25.40%
Min: -33.17%

Amphenol (APH) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV): A comparison of their net margin against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Software & Services industry group benchmarks.

Operating Margin (TTM)

CoreWeave (CRWV) reports a negative operating margin of -1.90%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Amphenol (APH) reports 29.68%, ranking against industry peers normally.

APH

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

29.68%

Max: 36.27%
APH: 29.68%
Q3: 18.36%
Median: 8.84%
Q1: 1.46%
Min: -21.39%

CRWV

Software & Services industry group

-1.90%

Max: 46.89%
Q3: 17.64%
Median: 8.73%
CRWV: -1.90%
Q1: -2.13%
Min: -30.45%

Amphenol (APH) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV): A comparison of their operating margin against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Software & Services industry group benchmarks.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Amphenol (APH) and CoreWeave (CRWV)
Metric	APH	CRWV
ROE (TTM)	40.08%	-43.60%
ROA (TTM)	16.00%	-0.24%
Net Margin (TTM)	17.95%	-25.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)	29.68%	-1.90%
Gross Margin (TTM)	39.21%	67.42%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both companies are growing quickly, but CoreWeave (CRWV) at 167.94% is the standout with revenue growth above its industry range; Amphenol (APH) at 51.71% also sits in the top quartile.

Amphenol (APH) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Only one side can be read here: Amphenol (APH) reports EPS growth of 73.96%, ranked against its industry; CoreWeave (CRWV) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Amphenol (APH) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Amphenol (APH) and CoreWeave (CRWV)
Metric	APH	CRWV
Revenue Growth (YoY)	51.71%	167.94%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	22.31%	586.92%
EPS Growth (YoY)	73.96%	--
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	29.72%	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Amphenol (APH) at 1.94 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while CoreWeave (CRWV) at 0.46 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for CRWV.

APH

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

1.94

Max: 5.34
Q3: 3.02
Median: 1.95
APH: 1.94
Q1: 1.32
Min: 0.17

CRWV

Software & Services industry group

0.46

Max: 5.11
Q3: 2.77
Median: 1.67
Q1: 1.01
CRWV: 0.46
Min: 0.03

Amphenol (APH) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV): A comparison of their current ratio against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Software & Services industry group benchmarks.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both balance sheets lean debt-heavy versus peers, but CRWV is more stretched: Amphenol (APH) at 1.03 sits in the higher-leverage quartile and CoreWeave (CRWV) at 10.27 is above its industry benchmark range.

APH

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

1.03

Max: 1.76
APH: 1.03
Q3: 0.78
Median: 0.24
Q1: 0.04
Min: 0.01

CRWV

Software & Services industry group

10.27

CRWV: 10.27
Max: 2.52
Q3: 1.13
Median: 0.40
Q1: 0.07
Min: 0.00

Amphenol (APH) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Software & Services industry group benchmarks.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Amphenol (APH) and CoreWeave (CRWV)
Metric	APH	CRWV
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.94	0.46
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	1.03	10.27
Net Debt / EBITDA	1.15	12.16

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CoreWeave (CRWV) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Amphenol (APH) reports a yield of 0.70%, ranking against industry peers normally.

APH

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

0.70%

Max: 0.73%
APH: 0.70%
Q3: 0.31%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CRWV

Software & Services industry group

0.00%

CRWV: 0.00%
Max: 0.00%
Q3: 0.00%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Amphenol (APH) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV): A comparison of their dividend yield against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Software & Services industry group benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CoreWeave (CRWV) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Amphenol (APH) reports a payout of 21.74%, ranking against industry peers normally.

APH

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

21.74%

Max: 32.27%
APH: 21.74%
Q3: 14.48%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CRWV

Software & Services industry group

0.00%

CRWV: 0.00%
Max: 0.00%
Q3: 0.00%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Amphenol (APH) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV): A comparison of their payout ratio against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Software & Services industry group benchmarks.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Amphenol (APH) and CoreWeave (CRWV)
Metric	APH	CRWV
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.70%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	21.74%	0.00%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Amphenol (APH) trades at 32.43 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while CoreWeave (CRWV) has no P/E ratio this period.

APH

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

32.43

Max: 69.48
Q3: 41.02
APH: 32.43
Median: 26.39
Q1: 19.36
Min: 6.07

CRWV

Software & Services industry group

Max: 112.94
Q3: 60.32
Median: 32.91
Q1: 18.77
Min: 6.69
CRWV: --

Amphenol (APH) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV): CRWV does not report P/E ratio, so it has no value marker; APH is benchmarked against the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Amphenol (APH) at 5.57 and CoreWeave (CRWV) at 3.37 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

APH

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

5.57

Max: 11.30
Q3: 5.82
APH: 5.57
Median: 2.56
Q1: 1.05
Min: 0.00

CRWV

Software & Services industry group

3.37

Max: 17.91
Q3: 8.78
Median: 4.25
CRWV: 3.37
Q1: 2.23
Min: 0.02

Amphenol (APH) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV): A comparison of their P/S ratio against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Software & Services industry group benchmarks.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

CoreWeave (CRWV) at 5.09 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Amphenol (APH) at 10.75 carries an above-peer premium to book — APH is pricier on assets.

APH

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

10.75

APH: 10.75
Max: 10.75
Q3: 5.52
Median: 3.17
Q1: 1.79
Min: 0.33

CRWV

Software & Services industry group

5.09

Max: 16.63
Q3: 8.50
CRWV: 5.09
Median: 4.30
Q1: 1.92
Min: -3.90

Amphenol (APH) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV): A comparison of their P/B ratio against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Software & Services industry group benchmarks.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Amphenol (APH) and CoreWeave (CRWV)
Metric	APH	CRWV
P/E Ratio (TTM)	32.43	--
P/S Ratio (TTM)	5.57	3.37
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	10.75	5.09
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	2.33%	-35.51%