Seek Returns logo

APH vs. CRDO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APH and CRDO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAPHCRDO
Company NameAmphenol CorporationCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd
CountryUnited StatesCayman Islands
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization153.58 billion USD25.75 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 8, 1991January 27, 2022
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APH and CRDO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APH vs. CRDO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAPHCRDO
5-Day Price Return1.79%-0.51%
13-Week Price Return28.08%52.55%
26-Week Price Return100.75%300.83%
52-Week Price Return100.14%357.50%
Month-to-Date Return1.65%2.24%
Year-to-Date Return81.12%121.50%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.07M5.85M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.62M5.59M
3-Month Volatility24.30%66.08%
Beta1.192.64

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

APH

30.97%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
21.57%
Q3
13.27%
Median
8.55%
Q1
4.42%
Min
-4.21%

APH’s Return on Equity of 30.97% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CRDO

18.89%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

CRDO’s Return on Equity of 18.89% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

APH vs. CRDO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

APH

16.90%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
17.31%
Q3
10.85%
Median
7.26%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-3.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.90% places APH in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CRDO

20.85%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

CRDO’s Net Profit Margin of 20.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

APH vs. CRDO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

APH

22.41%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
15.08%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-3.83%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.41% places APH in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CRDO

18.72%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

CRDO’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.72% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

APH vs. CRDO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPHCRDO
Return on Equity (TTM)30.97%18.89%
Return on Assets (TTM)14.20%16.29%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.90%20.85%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.41%18.72%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)34.73%65.98%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

APH

2.02

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.85
Median
2.03
Q1
1.51
Min
0.62

APH’s Current Ratio of 2.02 aligns with the median group of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CRDO

7.41

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

CRDO’s Current Ratio of 7.41 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

APH vs. CRDO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

APH

0.70

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.30
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

APH’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.70. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CRDO

0.00

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, CRDO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

APH vs. CRDO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

APH

14.88

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
79.05
Q3
36.62
Median
12.51
Q1
3.72
Min
-18.73

APH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.88 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRDO

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

Interest Coverage Ratio data for CRDO is currently unavailable.

APH vs. CRDO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPHCRDO
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.027.41
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.346.34
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.700.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.88--

Growth

Revenue Growth

APH vs. CRDO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

APH vs. CRDO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

APH

0.48%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.36%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

APH’s Dividend Yield of 0.48% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRDO

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRDO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

APH vs. CRDO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

APH

22.97%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
218.94%
Q3
90.25%
Median
38.81%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.00%

APH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.97% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRDO

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRDO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

APH vs. CRDO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPHCRDO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.48%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.97%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

APH

47.80

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
74.74
Q3
42.40
Median
26.55
Q1
20.05
Min
10.12

A P/E Ratio of 47.80 places APH in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CRDO

205.83

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

At 205.83, CRDO’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

APH vs. CRDO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

APH

8.08

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
3.58
Median
2.05
Q1
1.29
Min
0.20

With a P/S Ratio of 8.08, APH trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CRDO

42.91

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

With a P/S Ratio of 42.91, CRDO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

APH vs. CRDO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

APH

10.37

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.92
Q3
3.80
Median
2.23
Q1
1.42
Min
0.44

At 10.37, APH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CRDO

25.20

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

At 25.20, CRDO’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

APH vs. CRDO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPHCRDO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)47.80205.83
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.0842.91
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)10.3725.20
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)53.94244.08