Seek Returns logo

APH vs. CDW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APH and CDW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

APH’s market capitalization of 120.31 billion USD is substantially larger than CDW’s 23.98 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.13 for APH and 0.94 for CDW, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAPHCDW
Company NameAmphenol CorporationCDW Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryHardware, Equipment & PartsInformation Technology Services
CEORichard Adam NorwittChristine A. Leahy
Price99.46 USD182.13 USD
Market Cap120.31 billion USD23.98 billion USD
Beta1.130.94
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateNovember 8, 1991June 27, 2013
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APH and CDW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APH vs. CDW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

APH

27.13%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
38.64%
Q3
17.03%
Median
8.95%
Q1
1.23%
Min
-14.34%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, APH’s Return on Equity of 27.13% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CDW

47.24%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
23.27%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.22%
Min
-26.63%

In the upper quartile for the Information Technology Services industry, CDW’s Return on Equity of 47.24% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

APH vs. CDW: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

APH

15.20%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
17.24%
Q3
9.87%
Median
6.54%
Q1
1.56%
Min
-7.50%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, APH’s Return on Invested Capital of 15.20% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

CDW

13.23%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
28.29%
Q3
13.19%
Median
7.24%
Q1
0.23%
Min
-18.82%

In the upper quartile for the Information Technology Services industry, CDW’s Return on Invested Capital of 13.23% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

APH vs. CDW: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

APH

15.58%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
22.76%
Q3
11.04%
Median
3.80%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-8.57%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.58% places APH in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CDW

5.10%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
20.47%
Q3
11.62%
Median
5.97%
Q1
1.89%
Min
-4.62%

CDW’s Net Profit Margin of 5.10% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Information Technology Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

APH vs. CDW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

APH

21.26%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
25.25%
Q3
13.73%
Median
8.22%
Q1
4.35%
Min
-0.79%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.26% places APH in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CDW

7.90%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
29.42%
Q3
14.75%
Median
8.92%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-11.92%

CDW’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.90% is around the midpoint for the Information Technology Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

APH vs. CDW: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPHCDW
Return on Equity (TTM)27.13%47.24%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.41%7.24%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)15.20%13.23%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.58%5.10%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.26%7.90%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.94%21.86%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

APH

1.99

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
4.10
Q3
3.23
Median
2.37
Q1
1.81
Min
0.58

APH’s Current Ratio of 1.99 aligns with the median group of the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CDW

1.32

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.37
Median
1.58
Q1
1.20
Min
0.00

CDW’s Current Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the median group of the Information Technology Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

APH vs. CDW: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

APH

0.70

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
1.19
Q3
0.56
Median
0.33
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

APH’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.70. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CDW

2.58

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.16
Median
0.48
Q1
0.09
Min
0.01

CDW’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Information Technology Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.58. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

APH vs. CDW: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

APH

13.97

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
28.37
Q3
14.25
Median
9.35
Q1
2.86
Min
-13.16

APH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CDW

7.65

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
17.52
Q3
10.04
Median
4.66
Q1
0.80
Min
-10.50

CDW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.65 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

APH vs. CDW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPHCDW
Current Ratio (TTM)1.991.32
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.361.20
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.702.58
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.310.40
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.292.91
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.977.65

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for APH and CDW. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

APH vs. CDW: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

APH vs. CDW: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

APH vs. CDW: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

APH

0.66%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
2.16%
Q3
0.66%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.66%, APH offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CDW

1.37%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
16.57%
Q3
1.39%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CDW’s Dividend Yield of 1.37% is consistent with its peers in the Information Technology Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

APH vs. CDW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

APH

25.37%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
71.55%
Q3
25.37%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

APH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.37% is within the typical range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CDW

30.52%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
112.81%
Q3
20.98%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CDW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.52% is in the upper quartile for the Information Technology Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

APH vs. CDW: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPHCDW
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.66%1.37%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)25.37%30.52%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

APH

46.05

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
86.58
Q3
53.54
Median
36.07
Q1
25.99
Min
12.16

APH’s P/E Ratio of 46.05 is within the middle range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CDW

22.21

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
49.12
Q3
36.91
Median
24.84
Q1
15.88
Min
1.55

CDW’s P/E Ratio of 22.21 is within the middle range for the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

APH vs. CDW: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

APH

4.55

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
5.22
Q3
3.27
Median
2.16
Q1
1.77
Min
0.00

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry.

CDW

3.95

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
3.79
Median
2.23
Q1
1.19
Min
0.03

A Forward PEG Ratio of 3.95 places CDW in the upper quartile for the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

APH vs. CDW: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

APH

7.17

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.95
Median
2.45
Q1
1.17
Min
0.32

APH’s P/S Ratio of 7.17 is in the upper echelon for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CDW

1.12

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
8.15
Q3
4.17
Median
2.14
Q1
1.00
Min
0.10

CDW’s P/S Ratio of 1.12 aligns with the market consensus for the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

APH vs. CDW: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

APH

11.68

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
7.53
Q3
4.63
Median
3.34
Q1
2.35
Min
0.48

At 11.68, APH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CDW

10.39

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
11.78
Q3
6.14
Median
3.23
Q1
1.97
Min
0.42

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Information Technology Services industry.

APH vs. CDW: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPHCDW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)46.0522.21
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)4.553.95
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.171.12
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)11.6810.39
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)54.1123.88
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)29.5315.54
EV-to-Sales (TTM)7.501.38