Seek Returns logo

APG vs. GWW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APG and GWW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAPGGWW
Company NameAPi Group CorporationW.W. Grainger, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringTrading Companies & Distributors
Market Capitalization14.71 billion USD46.26 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 29, 2020February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APG and GWW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APG vs. GWW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAPGGWW
5-Day Price Return2.67%1.41%
13-Week Price Return2.52%-7.47%
26-Week Price Return56.39%-0.64%
52-Week Price Return65.78%-5.44%
Month-to-Date Return2.88%1.49%
Year-to-Date Return47.46%-8.24%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.85M0.25M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.38M0.30M
3-Month Volatility20.57%27.61%
Beta1.741.13

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

APG

8.22%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

APG’s Return on Equity of 8.22% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

GWW

54.86%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.99%
Q3
19.66%
Median
13.72%
Q1
9.74%
Min
-0.34%

GWW’s Return on Equity of 54.86% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

APG vs. GWW: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

APG

3.35%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

APG’s Net Profit Margin of 3.35% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GWW

10.99%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
16.11%
Q3
9.48%
Median
5.89%
Q1
3.68%
Min
-1.09%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.99% places GWW in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

APG vs. GWW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

APG

6.54%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

APG’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.54% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GWW

15.27%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
26.26%
Q3
14.59%
Median
7.05%
Q1
4.94%
Min
-8.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 15.27% places GWW in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

APG vs. GWW: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPGGWW
Return on Equity (TTM)8.22%54.86%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.00%21.63%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.35%10.99%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.54%15.27%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.08%39.25%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

APG

1.45

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

APG’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GWW

2.82

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
3.32
Q3
2.27
Median
1.60
Q1
1.41
Min
0.26

GWW’s Current Ratio of 2.82 is in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

APG vs. GWW: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

APG

0.96

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

APG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.96 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GWW

0.64

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.93
Q3
1.24
Median
0.79
Q1
0.61
Min
0.01

GWW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.64 is typical for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

APG vs. GWW: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

APG

3.16

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, APG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.16 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

GWW

34.56

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.67
Q1
2.04
Min
-1.67

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 34.56, GWW demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

APG vs. GWW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPGGWW
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.452.82
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.291.53
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.960.64
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.1634.56

Growth

Revenue Growth

APG vs. GWW: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

APG vs. GWW: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

APG

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

APG currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GWW

0.97%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
5.25%
Q3
2.95%
Median
2.06%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

GWW’s Dividend Yield of 0.97% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

APG vs. GWW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

APG

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

APG has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GWW

22.89%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
136.12%
Q3
71.34%
Median
47.49%
Q1
22.56%
Min
0.00%

GWW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.89% is within the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

APG vs. GWW: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPGGWW
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.97%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%22.89%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

APG

59.94

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

At 59.94, APG’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

GWW

23.66

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
42.69
Q3
25.21
Median
16.99
Q1
13.13
Min
5.35

GWW’s P/E Ratio of 23.66 is within the middle range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

APG vs. GWW: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

APG

2.01

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

APG’s P/S Ratio of 2.01 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GWW

2.60

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
2.71
Median
1.06
Q1
0.70
Min
0.30

GWW’s P/S Ratio of 2.60 aligns with the market consensus for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

APG vs. GWW: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

APG

4.46

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

APG’s P/B Ratio of 4.46 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GWW

13.60

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.63
Median
2.09
Q1
1.30
Min
0.31

At 13.60, GWW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

APG vs. GWW: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPGGWW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)59.9423.66
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.012.60
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.4613.60
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.1232.11