APD vs. SHW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APD and SHW, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With APD at 60.01 billion USD and SHW at 88.70 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
With betas of 0.89 for APD and 1.25 for SHW, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | APD | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | The Sherwin-Williams Company |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Basic Materials |
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty |
| CEO | Mr. Eduardo F. Menezes | Ms. Heidi G. Petz |
| Price | 269.67 USD | 353.94 USD |
| Market Cap | 60.01 billion USD | 88.70 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.89 | 1.25 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | March 17, 1980 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APD and SHW over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of APD and SHW based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- APD has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -13.85, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, SHW (P/FCF 40.77) indicates positive free cash flow generation.
| Symbol | APD | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 39.17 | 32.94 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 5.00 | 2.72 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.99 | 3.85 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 4.08 | 21.37 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -13.85 | 40.77 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 22.15 | 22.67 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.24 | 4.40 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -17.31 | 46.57 |
Dividend Comparison
APD’s dividend yield of 2.63% is about 210% higher than SHW’s 0.85%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | APD | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.63% | 0.85% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APD and SHW, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 1.00 and 0.77, both APD and SHW have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- SHW posts a quick ratio of 0.45, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while APD at 0.85 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- SHW is highly leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 3.10), elevating both potential gains and risks, compared to APD at 1.12, which maintains a steadier capital structure.
| Symbol | APD | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.00 | 0.77 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.85 | 0.45 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.12 | 3.10 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.42 | 0.52 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 7.66 | 9.13 |