APD vs. LIN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APD and LIN, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
LIN stands out with 214.41 billion USD in market value—about 3.57× APD’s market cap of 60.01 billion USD.
With betas of 0.89 for APD and 1.01 for LIN, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | APD | LIN |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | Linde plc |
| Country | US | GB |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Basic Materials |
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty |
| CEO | Mr. Eduardo F. Menezes | Mr. Sanjiv Lamba |
| Price | 269.67 USD | 455.5 USD |
| Market Cap | 60.01 billion USD | 214.41 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.89 | 1.01 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | June 17, 1992 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APD and LIN over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of APD and LIN based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- APD has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -13.85, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, LIN (P/FCF 43.66) indicates positive free cash flow generation.
| Symbol | APD | LIN |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 39.17 | 32.61 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 5.00 | 4.92 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.99 | 6.49 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 4.08 | 5.67 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -13.85 | 43.66 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 22.15 | 18.51 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.24 | 7.06 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -17.31 | 47.45 |
Dividend Comparison
APD’s dividend yield of 2.63% is about 112% higher than LIN’s 1.24%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | APD | LIN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.63% | 1.24% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APD and LIN, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 1.00 and 0.94, both APD and LIN have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
| Symbol | APD | LIN |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.00 | 0.94 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.85 | 0.80 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.12 | 0.63 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.42 | 0.29 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 7.66 | 34.75 |