Seek Returns logo

APD vs. CLF: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APD and CLF, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

APD’s market capitalization of 64.95 billion USD is substantially larger than CLF’s 4.36 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

CLF carries a higher beta at 1.85, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while APD (beta: 0.87) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAPDCLF
Company NameAir Products and Chemicals, Inc.Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorBasic MaterialsBasic Materials
IndustryChemicals - SpecialtySteel
CEOEduardo F. MenezesC. Lourenco Goncalves
Price291.84 USD8.82 USD
Market Cap64.95 billion USD4.36 billion USD
Beta0.871.85
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980November 5, 1987
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APD and CLF by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APD vs. CLF: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

APD

9.65%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
34.45%
Q3
15.78%
Median
7.65%
Q1
2.96%
Min
-12.04%

APD’s Return on Equity of 9.65% is on par with the norm for the Chemicals - Specialty industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CLF

-17.59%

Steel Industry

Max
19.41%
Q3
6.56%
Median
1.54%
Q1
-3.03%
Min
-12.88%

CLF has a negative Return on Equity of -17.59%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

APD vs. CLF: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

APD

3.50%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
10.99%
Median
5.25%
Q1
3.06%
Min
-8.62%

APD’s Return on Invested Capital of 3.50% is in line with the norm for the Chemicals - Specialty industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

CLF

-5.38%

Steel Industry

Max
8.44%
Q3
6.04%
Median
2.41%
Q1
-2.16%
Min
-5.38%

CLF has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -5.38%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

APD vs. CLF: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

APD

12.76%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
23.23%
Q3
10.64%
Median
5.14%
Q1
0.64%
Min
-8.93%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.76% places APD in the upper quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CLF

-6.35%

Steel Industry

Max
6.80%
Q3
4.40%
Median
0.88%
Q1
-2.05%
Min
-10.37%

CLF has a negative Net Profit Margin of -6.35%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

APD vs. CLF: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

APD

12.29%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
26.42%
Q3
15.81%
Median
10.07%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-7.44%

APD’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.29% is around the midpoint for the Chemicals - Specialty industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CLF

-6.75%

Steel Industry

Max
17.40%
Q3
7.61%
Median
4.75%
Q1
-0.70%
Min
-10.86%

CLF has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -6.75%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

APD vs. CLF: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPDCLF
Return on Equity (TTM)9.65%-17.59%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.94%-5.67%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)3.50%-5.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.76%-6.35%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.29%-6.75%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.94%-3.26%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

APD

1.00

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
3.95
Q3
2.60
Median
2.04
Q1
1.60
Min
0.77

APD’s Current Ratio of 1.00 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CLF

2.13

Steel Industry

Max
3.17
Q3
3.03
Median
2.58
Q1
1.87
Min
1.35

CLF’s Current Ratio of 2.13 aligns with the median group of the Steel industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

APD vs. CLF: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

APD

1.12

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
1.10
Median
0.73
Q1
0.55
Min
0.01

APD’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Chemicals - Specialty industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.12. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CLF

1.22

Steel Industry

Max
0.48
Q3
0.45
Median
0.27
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.22, CLF operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Steel industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

APD vs. CLF: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

APD

7.77

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
13.69
Q3
9.06
Median
5.24
Q1
1.68
Min
-3.09

APD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.77 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Chemicals - Specialty industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CLF

-2.82

Steel Industry

Max
28.82
Q3
10.16
Median
3.04
Q1
-2.82
Min
-8.78

CLF has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -2.82. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

APD vs. CLF: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPDCLF
Current Ratio (TTM)1.002.13
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.850.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.121.22
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.420.36
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)4.19-119.75
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.77-2.82

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for APD and CLF. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

APD vs. CLF: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

APD vs. CLF: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

APD vs. CLF: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

APD

2.44%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
9.19%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.46%
Q1
0.25%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.44%, APD offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Chemicals - Specialty industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CLF

0.00%

Steel Industry

Max
16.89%
Q3
3.75%
Median
1.68%
Q1
1.43%
Min
0.00%

CLF currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

APD vs. CLF: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

APD

102.68%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
163.70%
Q3
57.04%
Median
30.02%
Q1
12.51%
Min
0.00%

APD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 102.68% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

CLF

0.00%

Steel Industry

Max
222.70%
Q3
39.78%
Median
32.33%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CLF has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

APD vs. CLF: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPDCLF
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.44%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)102.68%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

APD

42.39

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
56.68
Q3
33.75
Median
23.45
Q1
16.09
Min
7.50

A P/E Ratio of 42.39 places APD in the upper quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CLF

-3.69

Steel Industry

Max
24.65
Q3
23.86
Median
21.78
Q1
15.59
Min
7.61

CLF has a negative P/E Ratio of -3.69. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

APD vs. CLF: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

APD

6.80

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
3.23
Median
1.64
Q1
0.96
Min
0.16

APD’s Forward PEG Ratio of 6.80 is exceptionally high for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

CLF

0.12

Steel Industry

Max
3.14
Q3
2.43
Median
0.99
Q1
0.40
Min
0.10

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Steel industry.

APD vs. CLF: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

APD

5.40

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
2.31
Median
1.38
Q1
0.89
Min
0.16

With a P/S Ratio of 5.40, APD trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CLF

0.23

Steel Industry

Max
1.22
Q3
0.82
Median
0.47
Q1
0.30
Min
0.19

In the lower quartile for the Steel industry, CLF’s P/S Ratio of 0.23 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

APD vs. CLF: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

APD

4.42

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
6.73
Q3
3.78
Median
1.56
Q1
1.27
Min
0.35

APD’s P/B Ratio of 4.42 is in the upper tier for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CLF

0.70

Steel Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.48
Median
0.77
Q1
0.59
Min
0.38

CLF’s P/B Ratio of 0.70 is within the conventional range for the Steel industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

APD vs. CLF: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPDCLF
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)42.39-3.69
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)6.800.12
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.400.23
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.420.70
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-14.99-4.14
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)22.33-189.00
EV-to-Sales (TTM)6.650.64