Seek Returns

APA vs. FANG: APA vs. Diamondback Energy Stock Comparison

How do APA (APA) and Diamondback Energy (FANG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

APA (APA) and Diamondback Energy (FANG) are both classified in the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production sub-industry within the broader Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Company profile comparison for APA (APA) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
Profile ItemAPAFANG
NameAPA CorporationDiamondback Energy Inc.
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Capitalization14.98 billion USD49.96 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNasdaq
Listing DateMay 15, 1979October 12, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

APA
FANG
GSPC
Loading price history…
APA (APA) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for APA (APA) and Diamondback Energy (FANG). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for APA (APA) and Diamondback Energy (FANG). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for APA (APA) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricAPAFANG
Total Return (1Y)92.90%26.99%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)11.25%8.52%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)11.68%14.17%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

APA
FANG
GSPC
Loading price history…
APA (APA) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for APA (APA) and Diamondback Energy (FANG). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for APA (APA) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricAPAFANG
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)44.92%33.77%
Beta (5Y)0.340.53
Max Drawdown (5Y)-70.47%-42.10%
Avg. Volume (3M)5.66M2.38M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
APA and FANG are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for APA (APA) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricAPAFANG
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.970.67
Sortino Ratio (1Y)2.940.97

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

APA (APA) at 33.32% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for APA.

APA

Energy industry group

33.32%

Max
53.85%
APA
33.32%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

FANG

Energy industry group

4.86%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
FANG
4.86%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

APA (APA) at 23.49% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

APA

Energy industry group

23.49%

Max
56.92%
APA
23.49%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

FANG

Energy industry group

11.62%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
FANG
11.62%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both APA (APA) at 44.25% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

APA

Energy industry group

44.25%

Max
71.31%
APA
44.25%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

FANG

Energy industry group

44.95%

Max
71.31%
FANG
44.95%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for APA (APA) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricAPAFANG
ROE (TTM)33.32%4.86%
ROA (TTM)14.06%2.07%
Net Margin (TTM)23.49%11.62%
Operating Margin (TTM)44.25%44.95%
Gross Margin (TTM)78.98%73.62%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while APA (APA) at -8.39% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

APA (APA) at 75.77% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for APA (APA) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricAPAFANG
Revenue Growth (YoY)-8.39%35.44%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-6.96%15.99%
EPS Growth (YoY)75.77%-63.10%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-28.73%-38.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both APA (APA) at 0.85 and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

APA

Energy industry group

0.85

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
APA
0.85
Min
0.24

FANG

Energy industry group

0.55

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
FANG
0.55
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while APA (APA) at 0.42 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

APA

Energy industry group

0.42

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
APA
0.42
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

FANG

Energy industry group

0.29

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
FANG
0.29
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for APA (APA) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricAPAFANG
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.850.55
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.420.29
Net Debt / EBITDA0.530.99

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both APA (APA) at 2.30% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.47% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

APA

Energy industry group

2.30%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
APA
2.30%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FANG

Energy industry group

2.47%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
FANG
2.47%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

APA (APA) at 16.26% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 57.20% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

APA

Energy industry group

16.26%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
APA
16.26%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FANG

Energy industry group

57.20%

Max
133.24%
FANG
57.20%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for APA (APA) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricAPAFANG
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.30%2.47%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)16.26%57.20%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

APA (APA) at 7.26 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.

APA

Energy industry group

7.26

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
APA
7.26
Min
2.99

FANG

Energy industry group

24.09

Max
39.54
FANG
24.09
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both APA (APA) at 1.62 and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

APA

Energy industry group

1.62

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
APA
1.62
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

FANG

Energy industry group

2.83

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
FANG
2.83
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both APA (APA) at 2.11 and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

APA

Energy industry group

2.11

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
APA
2.11
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

FANG

Energy industry group

1.28

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
FANG
1.28
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for APA (APA) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricAPAFANG
P/E Ratio (TTM)7.2624.09
P/S Ratio (TTM)1.622.83
P/B Ratio (MRQ)2.111.28
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)14.08%12.09%