Seek Returns

APA vs. EQT: APA vs. EQT Stock Comparison

How do APA (APA) and EQT (EQT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

APA (APA) and EQT (EQT) are both classified in the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production sub-industry within the broader Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Company profile comparison for APA (APA) and EQT (EQT)
Profile ItemAPAEQT
NameAPA CorporationEQT Corporation
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Capitalization14.98 billion USD30.90 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNYSE
Listing DateMay 15, 1979March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

APA
EQT
GSPC
Loading price history…
APA (APA) vs. EQT (EQT), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for APA (APA) and EQT (EQT). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for APA (APA) and EQT (EQT). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for APA (APA) and EQT (EQT)
MetricAPAEQT
Total Return (1Y)92.90%-12.42%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)11.25%9.89%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)11.68%21.61%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

APA
EQT
GSPC
Loading price history…
APA (APA) vs. EQT (EQT), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for APA (APA) and EQT (EQT). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for APA (APA) and EQT (EQT)
MetricAPAEQT
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)44.92%30.02%
Beta (5Y)0.340.70
Max Drawdown (5Y)-70.47%-42.56%
Avg. Volume (3M)5.66M7.75M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
APA and EQT are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for APA (APA) and EQT (EQT)
MetricAPAEQT
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.97-0.56
Sortino Ratio (1Y)2.94-0.80

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

APA (APA) at 33.32% sits in the top ROE quartile, while EQT (EQT) at 10.49% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for APA.

APA

Energy industry group

33.32%

Max
53.85%
APA
33.32%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

EQT

Energy industry group

10.49%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
EQT
10.49%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. EQT (EQT): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

For every dollar of sales, both APA (APA) at 23.49% and EQT (EQT) at 29.01% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

APA

Energy industry group

23.49%

Max
56.92%
APA
23.49%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

EQT

Energy industry group

29.01%

Max
56.92%
EQT
29.01%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. EQT (EQT): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

APA (APA) at 44.25% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of EQT (EQT) at 28.24%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

APA

Energy industry group

44.25%

Max
71.31%
APA
44.25%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

EQT

Energy industry group

28.24%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
EQT
28.24%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. EQT (EQT): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for APA (APA) and EQT (EQT)
MetricAPAEQT
ROE (TTM)33.32%10.49%
ROA (TTM)14.06%6.25%
Net Margin (TTM)23.49%29.01%
Operating Margin (TTM)44.25%28.24%
Gross Margin (TTM)78.98%80.40%

Growth

Revenue Growth

EQT (EQT) at 59.96% delivers above-range revenue growth, while APA (APA) at -8.39% falls into the bottom quartile — a wide split in revenue momentum.

Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. EQT (EQT): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both companies show strong earnings momentum, but EQT (EQT) at 635.56% is the standout with EPS growth above its industry range; APA (APA) at 75.77% also sits in the top quartile.

Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. EQT (EQT): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for APA (APA) and EQT (EQT)
MetricAPAEQT
Revenue Growth (YoY)-8.39%59.96%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-6.96%-11.72%
EPS Growth (YoY)75.77%635.56%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-28.73%-8.91%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both APA (APA) at 0.85 and EQT (EQT) at 0.71 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

APA

Energy industry group

0.85

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
APA
0.85
Min
0.24

EQT

Energy industry group

0.71

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
EQT
0.71
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. EQT (EQT): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

EQT (EQT) at 0.19 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while APA (APA) at 0.42 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

APA

Energy industry group

0.42

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
APA
0.42
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

EQT

Energy industry group

0.19

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
EQT
0.19
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. EQT (EQT): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for APA (APA) and EQT (EQT)
MetricAPAEQT
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.850.71
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.420.19
Net Debt / EBITDA0.530.81

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both APA (APA) at 2.30% and EQT (EQT) at 1.30% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

APA

Energy industry group

2.30%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
APA
2.30%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EQT

Energy industry group

1.30%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
EQT
1.30%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. EQT (EQT): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both APA (APA) at 16.26% and EQT (EQT) at 15.64% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

APA

Energy industry group

16.26%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
APA
16.26%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EQT

Energy industry group

15.64%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
EQT
15.64%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. EQT (EQT): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for APA (APA) and EQT (EQT)
MetricAPAEQT
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.30%1.30%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)16.26%15.64%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

APA (APA) at 7.26 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while EQT (EQT) at 11.71 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for APA, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

APA

Energy industry group

7.26

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
APA
7.26
Min
2.99

EQT

Energy industry group

11.71

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
EQT
11.71
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. EQT (EQT): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

APA (APA) at 1.62 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while EQT (EQT) at 3.38 sits in the pricier quartile — EQT costs more per dollar of sales.

APA

Energy industry group

1.62

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
APA
1.62
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

EQT

Energy industry group

3.38

Max
5.40
EQT
3.38
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. EQT (EQT): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both APA (APA) at 2.11 and EQT (EQT) at 1.21 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

APA

Energy industry group

2.11

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
APA
2.11
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

EQT

Energy industry group

1.21

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
EQT
1.21
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. EQT (EQT): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for APA (APA) and EQT (EQT)
MetricAPAEQT
P/E Ratio (TTM)7.2611.71
P/S Ratio (TTM)1.623.38
P/B Ratio (MRQ)2.111.21
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)14.08%8.01%