Seek Returns

APA vs. CCJ: APA vs. Cameco Stock Comparison

How do APA (APA) and Cameco (CCJ) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

APA (APA) and Cameco (CCJ) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though APA is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while CCJ falls under Coal & Consumable Fuels.

Company profile comparison for APA (APA) and Cameco (CCJ)
Profile ItemAPACCJ
NameAPA CorporationCameco Corporation
Country/RegionUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionCoal & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization14.98 billion USD31.05 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNYSE
Listing DateMay 15, 1979March 14, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

APA
CCJ
GSPC
Loading price history…
APA (APA) vs. Cameco (CCJ), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for APA (APA) and Cameco (CCJ). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for APA (APA) and Cameco (CCJ). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for APA (APA) and Cameco (CCJ)
MetricAPACCJ
Total Return (1Y)92.90%-18.97%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)11.25%21.14%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)11.68%22.20%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

APA
CCJ
GSPC
Loading price history…
APA (APA) vs. Cameco (CCJ), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for APA (APA) and Cameco (CCJ). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for APA (APA) and Cameco (CCJ)
MetricAPACCJ
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)44.92%51.10%
Beta (5Y)0.341.18
Max Drawdown (5Y)-70.47%-49.04%
Avg. Volume (3M)5.66M3.27M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
APA and CCJ are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for APA (APA) and Cameco (CCJ)
MetricAPACCJ
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.97-0.46
Sortino Ratio (1Y)2.94-0.64

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

APA (APA) at 33.32% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Cameco (CCJ) at 5.68% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for APA.

APA

Energy industry group

33.32%

Max
53.85%
APA
33.32%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

CCJ

Energy industry group

5.68%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
CCJ
5.68%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. Cameco (CCJ): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

APA (APA) at 23.49% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Cameco (CCJ) at 11.43%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

APA

Energy industry group

23.49%

Max
56.92%
APA
23.49%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

CCJ

Energy industry group

11.43%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
CCJ
11.43%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. Cameco (CCJ): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

APA (APA) at 44.25% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Cameco (CCJ) at 9.23%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

APA

Energy industry group

44.25%

Max
71.31%
APA
44.25%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

CCJ

Energy industry group

9.23%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
CCJ
9.23%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. Cameco (CCJ): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for APA (APA) and Cameco (CCJ)
MetricAPACCJ
ROE (TTM)33.32%5.68%
ROA (TTM)14.06%2.79%
Net Margin (TTM)23.49%11.43%
Operating Margin (TTM)44.25%9.23%
Gross Margin (TTM)78.98%33.83%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Cameco (CCJ) at 11.04% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while APA (APA) at -8.39% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. Cameco (CCJ): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both companies show strong earnings momentum, but Cameco (CCJ) at 246.15% is the standout with EPS growth above its industry range; APA (APA) at 75.77% also sits in the top quartile.

Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. Cameco (CCJ): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for APA (APA) and Cameco (CCJ)
MetricAPACCJ
Revenue Growth (YoY)-8.39%11.04%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-6.96%23.07%
EPS Growth (YoY)75.77%246.15%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-28.73%83.08%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Cameco (CCJ) at 2.55 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while APA (APA) at 0.85 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

APA

Energy industry group

0.85

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
APA
0.85
Min
0.24

CCJ

Energy industry group

2.55

Max
3.64
CCJ
2.55
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. Cameco (CCJ): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Cameco (CCJ) at 0.14 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while APA (APA) at 0.42 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

APA

Energy industry group

0.42

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
APA
0.42
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

CCJ

Energy industry group

0.14

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
CCJ
0.14
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. Cameco (CCJ): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for APA (APA) and Cameco (CCJ)
MetricAPACCJ
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.852.55
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.420.14
Net Debt / EBITDA0.530.19

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both APA (APA) at 2.30% and Cameco (CCJ) at 0.35% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

APA

Energy industry group

2.30%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
APA
2.30%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CCJ

Energy industry group

0.35%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
CCJ
0.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. Cameco (CCJ): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both APA (APA) at 16.26% and Cameco (CCJ) at 26.37% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

APA

Energy industry group

16.26%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
APA
16.26%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CCJ

Energy industry group

26.37%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
CCJ
26.37%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. Cameco (CCJ): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for APA (APA) and Cameco (CCJ)
MetricAPACCJ
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.30%0.35%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)16.26%26.37%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

APA (APA) at 7.26 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Cameco (CCJ) at 108.03 trades above its peer range — a wide earnings-valuation gap relative to industry peers.

APA

Energy industry group

7.26

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
APA
7.26
Min
2.99

CCJ

Energy industry group

108.03

CCJ
108.03
Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. Cameco (CCJ): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

APA (APA) at 1.62 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 8.93 clears its benchmark range — CCJ looks notably rich on sales.

APA

Energy industry group

1.62

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
APA
1.62
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

CCJ

Energy industry group

8.93

CCJ
8.93
Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. Cameco (CCJ): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

APA (APA) at 2.11 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 6.03 prices above its benchmark range — CCJ looks rich relative to book.

APA

Energy industry group

2.11

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
APA
2.11
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

CCJ

Energy industry group

6.03

CCJ
6.03
Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
APA (APA) vs. Cameco (CCJ): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for APA (APA) and Cameco (CCJ)
MetricAPACCJ
P/E Ratio (TTM)7.26108.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)1.628.93
P/B Ratio (MRQ)2.116.03
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)14.08%0.63%