AMZN vs. ULTA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMZN and ULTA, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AMZN dominates in value with a market cap of 2,135.17 billion USD, eclipsing ULTA’s 18.27 billion USD by roughly 116.84×.
With betas of 1.31 for AMZN and 1.06 for ULTA, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AMZN | ULTA |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Amazon.com, Inc. | Ulta Beauty, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| CEO | Mr. Andrew R. Jassy | Ms. Kecia L. Steelman |
| Price | 201.12 USD | 404.75 USD |
| Market Cap | 2,135.17 billion USD | 18.27 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.31 | 1.06 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | May 15, 1997 | October 25, 2007 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMZN and ULTA over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AMZN and ULTA, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AMZN | ULTA |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 32.34 | 15.59 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.61 | 1.30 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.28 | 1.62 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.97 | 7.53 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 102.60 | 19.03 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 16.31 | 11.00 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 3.39 | 1.73 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 105.82 | 20.30 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither AMZN nor ULTA currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | AMZN | ULTA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMZN and ULTA, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ULTA posts a quick ratio of 0.60, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AMZN at 0.84 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- AMZN (at 31.13) covers its interest payments, while ULTA shows “--” for minimal debt service.
| Symbol | AMZN | ULTA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.05 | 1.70 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.84 | 0.60 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.44 | 0.77 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.32 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 31.13 | -- |