Seek Returns logo

AMZN vs. TSLA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at AMZN and TSLA, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength.

Company Overview

AMZN’s market capitalization of 2,267.34 billion USD is substantially larger than TSLA’s 949.32 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

TSLA carries a higher beta at 2.46, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AMZN (beta: 1.33) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAMZNTSLA
Company NameAmazon.com, Inc.Tesla, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorConsumer CyclicalConsumer Cyclical
IndustrySpecialty RetailAuto - Manufacturers
CEOMr. Andrew R. JassyMr. Elon R. Musk
Price213.57 USD295.14 USD
Market Cap2,267.34 billion USD949.32 billion USD
Beta1.332.46
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateMay 15, 1997June 29, 2010
ADRNoNo

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of AMZN and TSLA over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

This section compares the market valuation of AMZN and TSLA. Key takeaways regarding their valuation, when viewed within their industry context, are presented in the commentary that follows.

  • TSLA’s Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of 148.17 is very high. This signifies that its stock is trading at a premium, likely reflecting market optimism about its future growth, though it also implies a higher risk if these growth expectations are not met.
  • TSLA’s Forward PEG ratio of 3.57 is very high. This signifies that its current stock price is notably elevated compared to its anticipated earnings growth rate, possibly indicating that the market has already factored in, or even exceeded, realistic future performance expectations.
  • AMZN’s Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio of 7.40 and TSLA’s P/B ratio of 12.72 are both very high. For AMZN, this typically means the market assigns a much greater value to the company than its net accounting worth, often due to factors like robust intangible assets or superior growth prospects. TSLA’s high P/B also suggests investors have high expectations for its future performance and are pricing it well above its book value.
SymbolAMZNTSLA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)34.34148.17
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.643.57
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.499.92
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)7.4012.72
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)17.2967.77
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.599.88

Dividend Comparison

Neither AMZN nor TSLA currently pays a dividend; this often suggests they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.

SymbolAMZNTSLA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section evaluates the financial strength of AMZN and TSLA. Noteworthy observations on their financial resilience, considered from an industry perspective, are detailed in the points that follow.

  • AMZN’s current ratio of 1.05 is considered low. This may signal potential challenges with its short-term liquidity, implying that its current assets might offer a limited buffer for meeting its immediate debts and could affect its capacity to smoothly manage upcoming financial duties.
SymbolAMZNTSLA
Current Ratio (TTM)1.052.00
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.841.54
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.440.18
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.210.10
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.50-0.23
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)31.1317.27