Seek Returns logo

AMZN vs. HLT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMZN and HLT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMZN’s market capitalization of 2,371.81 billion USD is substantially larger than HLT’s 64.99 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.33 for AMZN and 1.25 for HLT, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAMZNHLT
Company NameAmazon.com, Inc.Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorConsumer CyclicalConsumer Cyclical
IndustrySpecialty RetailTravel Lodging
CEOAndrew R. JassyChristopher J. Nassetta
Price223.41 USD273.42 USD
Market Cap2,371.81 billion USD64.99 billion USD
Beta1.331.25
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateMay 15, 1997December 12, 2013
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMZN and HLT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMZN vs. HLT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMZN

24.26%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
70.52%
Q3
29.03%
Median
10.90%
Q1
-7.86%
Min
-57.43%

AMZN’s Return on Equity of 24.26% is on par with the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HLT

-42.75%

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
54.87%
Q3
39.53%
Median
21.82%
Q1
-42.75%
Min
-92.80%

HLT has a negative Return on Equity of -42.75%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AMZN vs. HLT: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMZN

13.10%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
29.46%
Q3
13.75%
Median
8.05%
Q1
0.80%
Min
-17.95%

AMZN’s Return on Invested Capital of 13.10% is in line with the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

HLT

17.37%

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
22.47%
Q3
17.37%
Median
15.46%
Q1
6.72%
Min
-0.59%

HLT’s Return on Invested Capital of 17.37% is in line with the norm for the Travel Lodging industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AMZN vs. HLT: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMZN

10.14%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
8.49%
Median
3.43%
Q1
-0.69%
Min
-9.88%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.14% places AMZN in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

HLT

13.90%

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
19.75%
Q3
16.41%
Median
12.76%
Q1
11.98%
Min
9.75%

HLT’s Net Profit Margin of 13.90% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Travel Lodging industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMZN vs. HLT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMZN

11.02%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
24.47%
Q3
11.10%
Median
5.85%
Q1
0.66%
Min
-12.62%

AMZN’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.02% is around the midpoint for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HLT

21.01%

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
30.55%
Q3
21.77%
Median
21.15%
Q1
15.15%
Min
15.10%

HLT’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.01% is around the midpoint for the Travel Lodging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AMZN vs. HLT: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMZNHLT
Return on Equity (TTM)24.26%-42.75%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.25%9.79%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)13.10%17.37%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.14%13.90%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.02%21.01%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)49.16%26.82%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMZN

1.05

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.24
Q3
1.99
Median
1.42
Q1
1.02
Min
0.54

AMZN’s Current Ratio of 1.05 aligns with the median group of the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HLT

0.57

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
0.99
Q3
0.98
Median
0.96
Q1
0.83
Min
0.83

HLT’s Current Ratio of 0.57 is notably low, falling beneath the typical range for the Travel Lodging industry. This suggests a heightened liquidity risk and could indicate potential challenges in meeting its short-term obligations.

AMZN vs. HLT: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMZN

0.44

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.42
Median
0.87
Q1
0.35
Min
0.01

AMZN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.44 is typical for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HLT

-2.71

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
4.37
Q3
3.27
Median
2.12
Q1
1.13
Min
0.53

HLT has a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of -2.71, which indicates negative shareholder equity where liabilities exceed assets. This is a critical sign of financial distress.

AMZN vs. HLT: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMZN

31.13

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
17.19
Median
4.28
Q1
0.11
Min
-23.60

AMZN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 31.13 is in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

HLT

4.07

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
7.05
Q3
7.05
Median
5.31
Q1
4.28
Min
4.07

In the lower quartile for the Travel Lodging industry, HLT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.07 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

AMZN vs. HLT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMZNHLT
Current Ratio (TTM)1.050.57
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.840.57
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.44-2.71
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.210.74
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.504.37
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)31.134.07

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMZN and HLT. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMZN vs. HLT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMZN vs. HLT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMZN vs. HLT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMZN

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.54%
Q3
1.52%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMZN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HLT

0.22%

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
3.94%
Q3
1.93%
Median
0.94%
Q1
0.43%
Min
0.00%

HLT’s Dividend Yield of 0.22% is in the lower quartile for the Travel Lodging industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

AMZN vs. HLT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMZN

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
177.64%
Q3
9.49%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMZN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HLT

9.43%

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
114.17%
Q3
36.83%
Median
28.47%
Q1
9.43%
Min
0.00%

HLT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 9.43% is within the typical range for the Travel Lodging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AMZN vs. HLT: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMZNHLT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.22%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%9.43%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMZN

35.92

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
81.45
Q3
42.51
Median
25.40
Q1
12.72
Min
1.88

AMZN’s P/E Ratio of 35.92 is within the middle range for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HLT

41.80

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
40.59
Q3
29.79
Median
22.44
Q1
18.46
Min
2.45

At 41.80, HLT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Travel Lodging industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AMZN vs. HLT: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMZN

1.72

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
2.79
Median
1.76
Q1
0.69
Min
0.00

AMZN’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.72 is within the middle range of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

HLT

2.11

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.92
Median
1.46
Q1
0.89
Min
0.19

A Forward PEG Ratio of 2.11 places HLT in the upper quartile for the Travel Lodging industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

AMZN vs. HLT: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMZN

3.65

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.26
Q3
2.60
Median
1.29
Q1
0.41
Min
0.06

AMZN’s P/S Ratio of 3.65 is in the upper echelon for the Specialty Retail industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

HLT

5.75

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
5.59
Q3
4.22
Median
3.60
Q1
2.95
Min
1.17

With a P/S Ratio of 5.75, HLT trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Travel Lodging industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AMZN vs. HLT: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMZN

7.74

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
12.73
Q3
6.96
Median
3.28
Q1
1.42
Min
0.24

AMZN’s P/B Ratio of 7.74 is in the upper tier for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

HLT

-14.99

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
11.01
Q3
10.16
Median
6.87
Q1
3.05
Min
0.61

HLT has a negative P/B Ratio of -14.99, indicating its liabilities exceed its assets and result in negative shareholder equity. This is a critical warning sign of financial distress.

AMZN vs. HLT: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMZNHLT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)35.9241.80
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.722.11
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.655.75
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)7.74-14.99
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)113.9733.94
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)18.0729.87
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.756.74