AMT vs. WELL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Here’s a clear look at AMT and WELL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
| Symbol | AMT | WELL |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | American Tower Corporation | Welltower Inc. |
| Country | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Real Estate | Real Estate |
| GICS Industry Group | Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) | Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) |
| GICS Industry | Specialized REITs | Health Care REITs |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Telecom Tower REITs | Health Care REITs |
| Market Capitalization | 82.68 billion USD | 151.66 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 27, 1998 | March 19, 1980 |
| Security Type | REIT | REIT |
Both AMT and WELL are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.
WELL’s market capitalization (151.66 billion USD) is significantly greater than AMT’s (82.68 billion USD), highlighting its more substantial market valuation.
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of AMT and WELL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | AMT | WELL |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | -0.36% | 0.25% |
| 13-Week Price Return | 3.62% | 9.66% |
| 26-Week Price Return | 0.47% | 17.84% |
| 52-Week Price Return | -19.32% | 44.01% |
| Month-to-Date Return | -2.87% | -1.15% |
| Year-to-Date Return | 1.08% | 15.75% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 2.68M | 3.02M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 3.14M | 3.07M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 27.92% | 24.26% |
| Beta | 0.89 | 0.82 |
With betas of 0.89 for AMT and 0.82 for WELL, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
AMT
68.12%
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 21.80%
- Q3
- 21.79%
- Median
- 15.49%
- Q1
- 8.97%
- Min
- -1.71%
AMT’s Return on Equity of 68.12% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.
WELL
3.51%
Health Care REITs Industry
- Max
- 11.35%
- Q3
- 5.59%
- Median
- 2.78%
- Q1
- 1.76%
- Min
- 0.91%
WELL’s Return on Equity of 3.51% is on par with the norm for the Health Care REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
AMT
23.76%
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 55.06%
- Q3
- 37.64%
- Median
- 26.99%
- Q1
- 19.96%
- Min
- 3.76%
In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.
WELL
11.96%
Health Care REITs Industry
- Max
- 47.62%
- Q3
- 21.37%
- Median
- 8.14%
- Q1
- 3.87%
- Min
- 2.53%
In the Health Care REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
AMT
45.52%
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 78.54%
- Q3
- 47.75%
- Median
- 40.51%
- Q1
- 17.72%
- Min
- 11.44%
In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.
WELL
3.33%
Health Care REITs Industry
- Max
- 42.61%
- Q3
- 24.50%
- Median
- 16.44%
- Q1
- 11.65%
- Min
- 3.33%
In the Health Care REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | AMT | WELL |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 68.12% | 3.51% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 4.00% | 2.25% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 23.76% | 11.96% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 45.52% | 3.33% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 74.18% | 40.57% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
AMT
0.40
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 1.42
- Q3
- 0.96
- Median
- 0.65
- Q1
- 0.33
- Min
- 0.07
AMT’s Current Ratio of 0.40 aligns with the median group of the Specialized REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
WELL
1.67
Health Care REITs Industry
- Max
- 1.67
- Q3
- 1.10
- Median
- 0.70
- Q1
- 0.42
- Min
- 0.22
WELL’s Current Ratio of 1.67 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care REITs industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
AMT
10.19
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 4.54
- Q3
- 3.86
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.93
- Min
- 0.47
With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 10.19, AMT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Specialized REITs industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.
WELL
0.41
Health Care REITs Industry
- Max
- 1.31
- Q3
- 1.08
- Median
- 0.91
- Q1
- 0.72
- Min
- 0.41
Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care REITs industry, WELL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.41 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
AMT
2.50
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 5.52
- Q3
- 4.50
- Median
- 3.75
- Q1
- 2.41
- Min
- 1.23
AMT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.50 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Specialized REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
WELL
0.29
Health Care REITs Industry
- Max
- 1.93
- Q3
- 1.78
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 1.13
- Min
- 0.29
WELL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.29 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | AMT | WELL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.40 | 1.67 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 0.38 | 1.67 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 10.19 | 0.41 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 2.50 | 0.29 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Revenue Growth at a Glance
| Symbol | AMT | WELL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY) | 7.45% | 38.33% |
| Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY) | 5.11% | 37.55% |
| 3-Year Revenue CAGR | 3.34% | 22.74% |
| 5-Year Revenue CAGR | 5.77% | 18.67% |
EPS Growth
EPS Growth at a Glance
| Symbol | AMT | WELL |
|---|---|---|
| EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY) | -33.25% | 154.26% |
| EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY) | 12.08% | 15.68% |
| 3-Year EPS CAGR | 12.24% | 66.74% |
| 5-Year EPS CAGR | 7.32% | -9.79% |
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
AMT
3.82%
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 6.49%
- Q3
- 4.83%
- Median
- 4.20%
- Q1
- 3.30%
- Min
- 1.73%
AMT’s Dividend Yield of 3.82% is consistent with its peers in the Specialized REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.
WELL
1.24%
Health Care REITs Industry
- Max
- 6.08%
- Q3
- 5.69%
- Median
- 3.77%
- Q1
- 1.80%
- Min
- 1.24%
WELL’s Dividend Yield of 1.24% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care REITs industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
AMT
124.82%
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 175.92%
- Q3
- 142.34%
- Median
- 126.96%
- Q1
- 97.80%
- Min
- 38.01%
In the Specialized REITs industry, the Dividend Payout Ratio is often not a primary performance metric.
WELL
200.46%
Health Care REITs Industry
- Max
- 342.13%
- Q3
- 339.11%
- Median
- 269.28%
- Q1
- 183.40%
- Min
- 132.23%
In the Health Care REITs industry, the Dividend Payout Ratio is often not a primary performance metric.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | AMT | WELL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.82% | 1.24% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 124.82% | 200.46% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
AMT
32.64
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 50.04
- Q3
- 40.66
- Median
- 30.97
- Q1
- 20.53
- Min
- 9.93
The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.
WELL
107.64
Health Care REITs Industry
- Max
- 195.65
- Q3
- 178.69
- Median
- 140.34
- Q1
- 86.67
- Min
- 23.77
The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Health Care REITs industry.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
AMT
7.76
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 12.80
- Q3
- 9.78
- Median
- 8.19
- Q1
- 6.72
- Min
- 2.47
AMT’s P/S Ratio of 7.76 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialized REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
WELL
12.88
Health Care REITs Industry
- Max
- 12.88
- Q3
- 12.06
- Median
- 9.62
- Q1
- 6.83
- Min
- 4.95
WELL’s P/S Ratio of 12.88 is in the upper echelon for the Health Care REITs industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
AMT
22.65
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 22.65
- Q3
- 10.62
- Median
- 4.05
- Q1
- 2.03
- Min
- 1.04
AMT’s P/B Ratio of 22.65 is in the upper tier for the Specialized REITs industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
WELL
3.18
Health Care REITs Industry
- Max
- 3.18
- Q3
- 3.00
- Median
- 2.75
- Q1
- 2.30
- Min
- 1.53
WELL’s P/B Ratio of 3.18 is in the upper tier for the Health Care REITs industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | AMT | WELL |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 32.64 | 107.64 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 7.76 | 12.88 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 22.65 | 3.18 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 21.82 | 108.71 |