Seek Returns logo

AMT vs. WELL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMT and WELL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMT’s market capitalization stands at 103.81 billion USD, while WELL’s is 99.90 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

With betas of 0.83 for AMT and 0.92 for WELL, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAMTWELL
Company NameAmerican Tower CorporationWelltower Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorReal EstateReal Estate
IndustryREIT - SpecialtyREIT - Healthcare Facilities
CEOSteven O. VondranShankh S. Mitra
Price221.75 USD152.77 USD
Market Cap103.81 billion USD99.90 billion USD
Beta0.830.92
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateFebruary 27, 1998March 19, 1980
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMT and WELL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMT vs. WELL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMT

50.68%

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
37.06%
Q3
18.93%
Median
6.30%
Q1
-0.13%
Min
-15.30%

Return on Equity is often not a primary performance indicator in the REIT - Specialty industry.

WELL

3.46%

REIT - Healthcare Facilities Industry

Max
10.72%
Q3
7.10%
Median
2.90%
Q1
-1.40%
Min
-7.20%

Return on Equity is often not a primary performance indicator in the REIT - Healthcare Facilities industry.

AMT vs. WELL: A comparison of their ROE against their respective REIT - Specialty and REIT - Healthcare Facilities industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMT

7.12%

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
13.73%
Q3
9.56%
Median
7.01%
Q1
4.47%
Min
3.05%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the REIT - Specialty industry.

WELL

14.13%

REIT - Healthcare Facilities Industry

Max
22.07%
Q3
15.73%
Median
5.67%
Q1
3.40%
Min
0.27%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the REIT - Healthcare Facilities industry.

AMT vs. WELL: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective REIT - Specialty and REIT - Healthcare Facilities industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMT

17.34%

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
50.00%
Q3
26.13%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.75%
Min
1.95%

In the REIT - Specialty industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

WELL

12.77%

REIT - Healthcare Facilities Industry

Max
65.80%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.37%
Q1
-2.72%
Min
-32.02%

In the REIT - Healthcare Facilities industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

AMT vs. WELL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective REIT - Specialty and REIT - Healthcare Facilities industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMT

45.66%

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
73.20%
Q3
47.39%
Median
32.80%
Q1
16.51%
Min
8.59%

In the REIT - Specialty industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

WELL

15.09%

REIT - Healthcare Facilities Industry

Max
62.79%
Q3
51.33%
Median
25.04%
Q1
13.62%
Min
2.16%

In the REIT - Healthcare Facilities industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

AMT vs. WELL: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective REIT - Specialty and REIT - Healthcare Facilities industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMTWELL
Return on Equity (TTM)50.68%3.46%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.94%2.03%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)7.12%14.13%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.34%12.77%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)45.66%15.09%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)68.44%28.57%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMT

0.55

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
4.07
Q3
2.38
Median
1.43
Q1
0.59
Min
0.19

For the REIT - Specialty industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

WELL

--

REIT - Healthcare Facilities Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.84
Median
0.97
Q1
0.15
Min
0.06

For the REIT - Healthcare Facilities industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

AMT vs. WELL: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective REIT - Specialty and REIT - Healthcare Facilities industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMT

12.56

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
1.56
Median
1.11
Q1
0.55
Min
0.42

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 12.56, AMT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the REIT - Specialty industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

WELL

0.07

REIT - Healthcare Facilities Industry

Max
1.13
Q3
1.12
Median
0.91
Q1
0.56
Min
0.07

Falling into the lower quartile for the REIT - Healthcare Facilities industry, WELL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.07 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AMT vs. WELL: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective REIT - Specialty and REIT - Healthcare Facilities industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMT

3.51

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
3.62
Q3
3.44
Median
3.01
Q1
2.44
Min
1.17

AMT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.51 is in the upper quartile for the REIT - Specialty industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

WELL

2.24

REIT - Healthcare Facilities Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
3.16
Median
1.93
Q1
1.24
Min
0.10

WELL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.24 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the REIT - Healthcare Facilities industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AMT vs. WELL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective REIT - Specialty and REIT - Healthcare Facilities industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMTWELL
Current Ratio (TTM)0.55--
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.55--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)12.560.07
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.720.05
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)5.68-0.33
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.512.24

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMT and WELL. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMT vs. WELL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMT vs. WELL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMT vs. WELL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMT

2.99%

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
13.18%
Q3
6.30%
Median
4.63%
Q1
2.61%
Min
0.00%

AMT’s Dividend Yield of 2.99% is consistent with its peers in the REIT - Specialty industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

WELL

1.75%

REIT - Healthcare Facilities Industry

Max
11.59%
Q3
7.33%
Median
6.81%
Q1
3.68%
Min
1.12%

WELL’s Dividend Yield of 1.75% is in the lower quartile for the REIT - Healthcare Facilities industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

AMT vs. WELL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective REIT - Specialty and REIT - Healthcare Facilities industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMT

124.45%

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
667.77%
Q3
177.73%
Median
119.02%
Q1
86.06%
Min
0.14%

AMT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 124.45% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

WELL

150.16%

REIT - Healthcare Facilities Industry

Max
812.77%
Q3
272.41%
Median
200.39%
Q1
133.68%
Min
86.77%

WELL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 150.16% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

AMT vs. WELL: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective REIT - Specialty and REIT - Healthcare Facilities industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMTWELL
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.99%1.75%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)124.45%150.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMT

56.78

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
82.59
Q3
54.68
Median
29.28
Q1
15.94
Min
8.64

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the REIT - Specialty industry.

WELL

90.80

REIT - Healthcare Facilities Industry

Max
56.66
Q3
50.07
Median
35.32
Q1
26.30
Min
17.88

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the REIT - Healthcare Facilities industry.

AMT vs. WELL: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective REIT - Specialty and REIT - Healthcare Facilities industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMT

4.98

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
12.06
Q3
5.37
Median
2.44
Q1
0.82
Min
0.51

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the REIT - Specialty industry.

WELL

-0.91

REIT - Healthcare Facilities Industry

Max
13.85
Q3
7.33
Median
1.39
Q1
0.39
Min
0.02

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the REIT - Healthcare Facilities industry.

AMT vs. WELL: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective REIT - Specialty and REIT - Healthcare Facilities industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMT

9.86

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
9.68
Q3
8.45
Median
5.59
Q1
2.71
Min
0.89

With a P/S Ratio of 9.86, AMT trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the REIT - Specialty industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

WELL

11.79

REIT - Healthcare Facilities Industry

Max
11.74
Q3
8.13
Median
5.60
Q1
3.88
Min
0.57

With a P/S Ratio of 11.79, WELL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the REIT - Healthcare Facilities industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AMT vs. WELL: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective REIT - Specialty and REIT - Healthcare Facilities industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMT

29.34

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
10.05
Q3
5.14
Median
1.95
Q1
1.66
Min
1.09

At 29.34, AMT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the REIT - Specialty industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

WELL

2.89

REIT - Healthcare Facilities Industry

Max
3.21
Q3
2.31
Median
1.62
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

WELL’s P/B Ratio of 2.89 is in the upper tier for the REIT - Healthcare Facilities industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AMT vs. WELL: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective REIT - Specialty and REIT - Healthcare Facilities industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMTWELL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)56.7890.80
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)4.98-0.91
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)9.8611.79
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)29.342.89
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)27.4844.61
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)19.6233.22
EV-to-Sales (TTM)13.8711.67