AMT vs. VTR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMT and VTR, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AMT dominates in value with a market cap of 100.06 billion USD, eclipsing VTR’s 28.71 billion USD by roughly 3.48×.
With betas of 0.88 for AMT and 0.97 for VTR, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AMT | VTR |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | American Tower Corporation | Ventas, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Real Estate | Real Estate |
| Industry | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Healthcare Facilities |
| CEO | Mr. Steven O. Vondran J.D. | Ms. Debra A. Cafaro |
| Price | 213.73 USD | 63.62 USD |
| Market Cap | 100.06 billion USD | 28.71 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.88 | 0.97 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | February 27, 1998 | May 5, 1997 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMT and VTR over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AMT and VTR based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- VTR features a high P/E of 293.18, indicating strong growth expectations, compared to AMT at 54.73, which trades at a more standard valuation based on its current earnings.
- VTR shows a negative forward PEG of -2.93, signaling expected earnings contraction, while AMT at 4.87 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
| Symbol | AMT | VTR |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 54.73 | 293.18 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 4.87 | -2.93 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 9.50 | 5.65 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 28.28 | 2.44 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 26.49 | 30.68 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 19.11 | 14.72 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 13.51 | 5.61 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 37.68 | 30.49 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AMT and VTR offer similar dividend yields (3.07% vs. 2.88%), indicating comparable approaches to balancing income and growth.
| Symbol | AMT | VTR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.07% | 2.88% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMT and VTR, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.55 and 0.00, both AMT and VTR have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both AMT (quick ratio 0.55) and VTR (quick ratio 0.00) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
- AMT is heavily leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 12.56), which can boost returns but raises risk if borrowing costs climb, while VTR at 0.00 keeps leverage at a more moderate level.
| Symbol | AMT | VTR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.55 | 0.00 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.55 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 12.56 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.72 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 3.51 | 1.69 |