AMT vs. SPG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMT and SPG, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AMT dominates in value with a market cap of 100.06 billion USD, eclipsing SPG’s 51.61 billion USD by roughly 1.94×.
SPG carries a higher beta at 1.46, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AMT remains steadier at 0.88.
Symbol | AMT | SPG |
---|---|---|
Company Name | American Tower Corporation | Simon Property Group, Inc. |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Real Estate | Real Estate |
Industry | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Retail |
CEO | Mr. Steven O. Vondran J.D. | Mr. David E. Simon |
Price | 213.73 USD | 158.12 USD |
Market Cap | 100.06 billion USD | 51.61 billion USD |
Beta | 0.88 | 1.46 |
Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
IPO Date | February 27, 1998 | December 14, 1993 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMT and SPG over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AMT and SPG, please refer to the table below.
Symbol | AMT | SPG |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 54.73 | 25.13 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 4.87 | 18.74 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 9.50 | 8.61 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 28.28 | 19.80 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 26.49 | 16.94 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 19.11 | 16.32 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 13.51 | 12.60 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 37.68 | 24.79 |
Dividend Comparison
SPG stands out with a 5.22% dividend yield—around 70% above AMT’s 3.07%—highlighting its emphasis on generous payouts.
Symbol | AMT | SPG |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.07% | 5.22% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMT and SPG, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.55 and 0.67, both AMT and SPG have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both AMT (quick ratio 0.55) and SPG (quick ratio 0.67) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
- AMT and SPG both have debt-to-equity ratios above 3 (12.56 and 9.70), reflecting aggressive use of debt that can amplify gains but also increase vulnerability to rising rates.
Symbol | AMT | SPG |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.55 | 0.67 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.55 | 0.67 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 12.56 | 9.70 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.72 | 0.78 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 3.51 | 3.42 |