AMT vs. O: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMT and O, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AMT dominates in value with a market cap of 100.06 billion USD, eclipsing O’s 49.90 billion USD by roughly 2.01×.
With betas of 0.88 for AMT and 0.79 for O, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AMT | O |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | American Tower Corporation | Realty Income Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Real Estate | Real Estate |
| Industry | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Retail |
| CEO | Mr. Steven O. Vondran J.D. | Mr. Sumit Roy |
| Price | 213.73 USD | 55.25 USD |
| Market Cap | 100.06 billion USD | 49.90 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.88 | 0.79 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | February 27, 1998 | October 18, 1994 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMT and O over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AMT and O based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- O shows a negative forward PEG of -0.50, signaling expected earnings contraction, while AMT at 4.87 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
| Symbol | AMT | O |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 54.73 | 50.36 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 4.87 | -0.50 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 9.50 | 9.25 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 28.28 | 1.26 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 26.49 | 13.93 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 19.11 | 17.96 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 13.51 | 14.30 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 37.68 | 21.53 |
Dividend Comparison
O stands out with a 5.75% dividend yield—around 87% above AMT’s 3.07%—highlighting its emphasis on generous payouts.
| Symbol | AMT | O |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.07% | 5.75% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMT and O, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AMT’s current ratio of 0.55 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while O at 1.45 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- AMT’s quick ratio of 0.55 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas O at 1.45 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- AMT is heavily leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 12.56), which can boost returns but raises risk if borrowing costs climb, while O at 0.71 keeps leverage at a more moderate level.
| Symbol | AMT | O |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.55 | 1.45 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.55 | 1.45 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 12.56 | 0.71 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.72 | 0.39 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 3.51 | 2.34 |