Seek Returns logo

AMT vs. CSGP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMT and CSGP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

A key difference in structure is that AMT is a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), a company that primarily invests in income-generating real estate, whereas CSGP is a conventional stock.

SymbolAMTCSGP
Company NameAmerican Tower CorporationCoStar Group, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustrySpecialized REITsReal Estate Management & Development
Market Capitalization89.07 billion USD35.93 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateFebruary 27, 1998July 1, 1998
Security TypeREITCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMT and CSGP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMT vs. CSGP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMTCSGP
5-Day Price Return-2.23%0.68%
13-Week Price Return-14.22%3.26%
26-Week Price Return-12.59%7.03%
52-Week Price Return-17.97%12.90%
Month-to-Date Return-1.10%0.51%
Year-to-Date Return3.71%18.45%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.02M2.96M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.49M2.84M
3-Month Volatility20.40%25.71%
Beta0.930.86

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMT

36.23%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
21.01%
Q3
17.78%
Median
8.42%
Q1
6.83%
Min
-1.71%

AMT’s Return on Equity of 36.23% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CSGP

1.29%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
20.58%
Q3
9.51%
Median
3.59%
Q1
0.57%
Min
-9.76%

CSGP’s Return on Equity of 1.29% is on par with the norm for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AMT vs. CSGP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMT

12.60%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
70.20%
Q3
38.00%
Median
23.98%
Q1
6.53%
Min
-1.41%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

CSGP

3.57%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
61.27%
Q3
26.17%
Median
9.35%
Q1
2.35%
Min
-23.71%

CSGP’s Net Profit Margin of 3.57% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMT vs. CSGP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMT

45.53%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
107.13%
Q3
54.03%
Median
42.12%
Q1
16.28%
Min
5.86%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

CSGP

-0.22%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
114.22%
Q3
51.26%
Median
23.27%
Q1
7.24%
Min
-44.62%

CSGP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.22%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AMT vs. CSGP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMTCSGP
Return on Equity (TTM)36.23%1.29%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.07%1.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.60%3.57%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)45.53%-0.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)74.37%79.33%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMT

0.61

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
1.08
Median
0.58
Q1
0.34
Min
0.10

AMT’s Current Ratio of 0.61 aligns with the median group of the Specialized REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CSGP

5.83

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
4.10
Q3
2.25
Median
1.48
Q1
1.00
Min
0.04

CSGP’s Current Ratio of 5.83 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

AMT vs. CSGP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMT

10.10

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.86
Q3
3.80
Median
1.22
Q1
0.73
Min
0.16

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 10.10, AMT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Specialized REITs industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CSGP

0.12

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.32
Median
0.85
Q1
0.40
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, CSGP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.12 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AMT vs. CSGP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMT

5.07

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
3.92
Median
2.94
Q1
2.07
Min
1.14

AMT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.07 is in the upper quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CSGP

14.65

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
29.35
Q3
12.97
Median
3.68
Q1
1.32
Min
-3.02

CSGP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.65 is in the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AMT vs. CSGP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMTCSGP
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.615.83
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.515.72
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)10.100.12
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.0714.65

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMT vs. CSGP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMT vs. CSGP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMT

3.44%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
6.92%
Q3
5.29%
Median
4.71%
Q1
3.25%
Min
2.16%

AMT’s Dividend Yield of 3.44% is consistent with its peers in the Specialized REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CSGP

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
6.97%
Q3
3.55%
Median
2.31%
Q1
0.48%
Min
0.00%

CSGP currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AMT vs. CSGP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMT

111.40%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
338.69%
Q3
202.75%
Median
125.21%
Q1
107.89%
Min
16.73%

AMT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 111.40% is within the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CSGP

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
310.03%
Q3
143.62%
Median
62.44%
Q1
29.44%
Min
0.00%

CSGP has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AMT vs. CSGP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMTCSGP
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.44%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)111.40%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMT

69.24

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
119.95
Q3
64.19
Median
27.78
Q1
23.88
Min
5.25

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.

CSGP

343.80

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
56.83
Q3
31.11
Median
15.41
Q1
11.32
Min
3.67

At 343.80, CSGP’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AMT vs. CSGP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMT

8.73

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
10.35
Q3
8.84
Median
8.28
Q1
5.39
Min
1.68

AMT’s P/S Ratio of 8.73 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialized REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CSGP

12.29

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
12.20
Q3
5.67
Median
2.73
Q1
0.97
Min
0.06

With a P/S Ratio of 12.29, CSGP trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AMT vs. CSGP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMT

27.87

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
13.73
Q3
7.48
Median
2.56
Q1
1.70
Min
0.71

At 27.87, AMT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Specialized REITs industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CSGP

3.94

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.36
Q3
1.20
Median
0.75
Q1
0.39
Min
0.06

At 3.94, CSGP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AMT vs. CSGP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMTCSGP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)69.24343.80
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.7312.29
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)27.873.94
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)23.931,214.37