AMT vs. CSGP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at AMT and CSGP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
A key difference in structure is that AMT is a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), a company that primarily invests in income-generating real estate, whereas CSGP is a conventional stock.
| Symbol | AMT | CSGP |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | American Tower Corporation | CoStar Group, Inc. |
| Country | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Real Estate | Real Estate |
| GICS Industry | Specialized REITs | Real Estate Management & Development |
| Market Capitalization | 85.58 billion USD | 28.88 billion USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NasdaqGS |
| Listing Date | February 27, 1998 | July 1, 1998 |
| Security Type | REIT | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of AMT and CSGP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | AMT | CSGP |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | 2.15% | 1.22% |
| 13-Week Price Return | -10.93% | -24.10% |
| 26-Week Price Return | -9.99% | -9.48% |
| 52-Week Price Return | -5.93% | -10.19% |
| Month-to-Date Return | 2.58% | -1.10% |
| Year-to-Date Return | 0.10% | -4.94% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 2.99M | 4.58M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 2.75M | 3.24M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 20.55% | 29.52% |
| Beta | 0.92 | 0.84 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
AMT
80.60%
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 21.01%
- Q3
- 18.18%
- Median
- 9.46%
- Q1
- 6.81%
- Min
- -1.71%
AMT’s Return on Equity of 80.60% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.
CSGP
0.24%
Real Estate Management & Development Industry
- Max
- 19.92%
- Q3
- 9.68%
- Median
- 3.86%
- Q1
- 0.61%
- Min
- -8.89%
CSGP’s Return on Equity of 0.24% is in the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
AMT
28.11%
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 89.50%
- Q3
- 41.93%
- Median
- 28.06%
- Q1
- 6.77%
- Min
- -1.41%
In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.
CSGP
0.66%
Real Estate Management & Development Industry
- Max
- 69.53%
- Q3
- 31.03%
- Median
- 9.23%
- Q1
- 2.36%
- Min
- -23.71%
Falling into the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, CSGP’s Net Profit Margin of 0.66% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
AMT
45.58%
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 107.13%
- Q3
- 56.09%
- Median
- 42.12%
- Q1
- 16.71%
- Min
- 8.05%
In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.
CSGP
-2.65%
Real Estate Management & Development Industry
- Max
- 114.22%
- Q3
- 51.67%
- Median
- 24.95%
- Q1
- 7.35%
- Min
- -44.62%
CSGP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.65%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | AMT | CSGP |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 80.60% | 0.24% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 4.69% | 0.20% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 28.11% | 0.66% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 45.58% | -2.65% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 74.29% | 79.25% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
AMT
0.59
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 1.96
- Q3
- 1.17
- Median
- 0.59
- Q1
- 0.40
- Min
- 0.18
AMT’s Current Ratio of 0.59 aligns with the median group of the Specialized REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
CSGP
3.12
Real Estate Management & Development Industry
- Max
- 4.40
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.52
- Q1
- 1.02
- Min
- 0.06
CSGP’s Current Ratio of 3.12 is in the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
AMT
9.42
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 5.86
- Q3
- 3.59
- Median
- 1.22
- Q1
- 0.62
- Min
- 0.16
With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 9.42, AMT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Specialized REITs industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.
CSGP
0.12
Real Estate Management & Development Industry
- Max
- 2.60
- Q3
- 1.33
- Median
- 0.82
- Q1
- 0.40
- Min
- 0.00
Falling into the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, CSGP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.12 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
AMT
5.07
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 5.24
- Q3
- 4.21
- Median
- 2.99
- Q1
- 2.08
- Min
- 1.14
AMT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.07 is in the upper quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.
CSGP
14.65
Real Estate Management & Development Industry
- Max
- 30.61
- Q3
- 14.23
- Median
- 3.84
- Q1
- 1.74
- Min
- -1.97
CSGP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.65 is in the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | AMT | CSGP |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.59 | 3.12 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 0.47 | 2.97 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 9.42 | 0.12 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 5.07 | 14.65 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
AMT
3.63%
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 7.38%
- Q3
- 5.67%
- Median
- 4.70%
- Q1
- 3.55%
- Min
- 2.22%
AMT’s Dividend Yield of 3.63% is consistent with its peers in the Specialized REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.
CSGP
0.00%
Real Estate Management & Development Industry
- Max
- 6.29%
- Q3
- 3.64%
- Median
- 2.24%
- Q1
- 0.56%
- Min
- 0.00%
CSGP currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
AMT
106.15%
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 218.54%
- Q3
- 158.23%
- Median
- 122.76%
- Q1
- 94.76%
- Min
- 16.73%
AMT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 106.15% is within the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.
CSGP
0.00%
Real Estate Management & Development Industry
- Max
- 290.47%
- Q3
- 140.89%
- Median
- 56.37%
- Q1
- 29.04%
- Min
- 0.00%
CSGP has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | AMT | CSGP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.63% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 106.15% | 0.00% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
AMT
29.25
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 72.02
- Q3
- 45.17
- Median
- 27.34
- Q1
- 18.18
- Min
- 4.41
The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.
CSGP
1,422.10
Real Estate Management & Development Industry
- Max
- 56.78
- Q3
- 29.72
- Median
- 15.84
- Q1
- 10.97
- Min
- 3.65
At 1,422.10, CSGP’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
AMT
8.22
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 10.44
- Q3
- 8.46
- Median
- 7.76
- Q1
- 5.30
- Min
- 2.06
AMT’s P/S Ratio of 8.22 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialized REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
CSGP
9.45
Real Estate Management & Development Industry
- Max
- 11.86
- Q3
- 5.68
- Median
- 2.97
- Q1
- 1.01
- Min
- 0.05
CSGP’s P/S Ratio of 9.45 is in the upper echelon for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
AMT
22.78
Specialized REITs Industry
- Max
- 12.00
- Q3
- 6.44
- Median
- 2.47
- Q1
- 1.61
- Min
- 0.61
At 22.78, AMT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Specialized REITs industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.
CSGP
4.15
Real Estate Management & Development Industry
- Max
- 2.48
- Q3
- 1.23
- Median
- 0.74
- Q1
- 0.39
- Min
- 0.06
At 4.15, CSGP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | AMT | CSGP |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 29.25 | 1,422.10 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 8.22 | 9.45 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 22.78 | 4.15 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 23.29 | 978.60 |