AMT vs. CPT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 21, 2025

Here’s a clear look at AMT and CPT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both AMT and CPT are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

Symbol	AMT	CPT
Company Name	American Tower Corporation	Camden Property Trust
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Real Estate	Real Estate
GICS Industry	Specialized REITs	Residential REITs
Market Capitalization	95.59 billion USD	11.43 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	February 27, 1998	July 22, 1993
Security Type	REIT	REIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMT and CPT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMT vs. CPT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	AMT	CPT
5-Day Price Return	-2.79%	0.03%
13-Week Price Return	-1.81%	-10.05%
26-Week Price Return	7.59%	-9.09%
52-Week Price Return	-9.48%	-10.49%
Month-to-Date Return	-2.03%	-2.01%
Year-to-Date Return	11.31%	-7.79%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2.29M	1.14M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.62M	1.02M
3-Month Volatility	23.09%	18.98%
Beta	0.89	0.83

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMT

36.23%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 37.66%
Q3: 20.19%
Median: 8.96%
Q1: 6.32%
Min: -1.71%

In the upper quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, AMT’s Return on Equity of 36.23% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CPT

3.35%

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 12.21%
Q3: 9.45%
Median: 7.42%
Q1: 2.50%
Min: 0.37%

CPT’s Return on Equity of 3.35% is on par with the norm for the Residential REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AMT vs. CPT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMT

12.60%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 67.81%
Q3: 40.70%
Median: 25.91%
Q1: 11.01%
Min: 1.95%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

CPT

9.99%

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 67.49%
Q3: 38.86%
Median: 25.74%
Q1: 7.62%
Min: 0.15%

In the Residential REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

AMT vs. CPT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMT

45.53%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 107.13%
Q3: 55.10%
Median: 41.03%
Q1: 17.97%
Min: 5.94%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

CPT

7.63%

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 54.06%
Q3: 45.82%
Median: 29.89%
Q1: 19.34%
Min: 5.28%

In the Residential REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

AMT vs. CPT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	AMT	CPT
Return on Equity (TTM)	36.23%	3.35%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.07%	1.74%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	12.60%	9.99%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	45.53%	7.63%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	74.37%	61.19%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMT

0.61

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 1.74
Q3: 1.13
Median: 0.59
Q1: 0.35
Min: 0.09

AMT’s Current Ratio of 0.61 aligns with the median group of the Specialized REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CPT

0.10

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 1.28
Q3: 0.64
Median: 0.21
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

CPT’s Current Ratio of 0.10 falls into the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AMT vs. CPT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMT

10.10

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 4.54
Q3: 3.26
Median: 1.09
Q1: 0.58
Min: 0.16

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 10.10, AMT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Specialized REITs industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CPT

0.83

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 1.62
Q3: 1.10
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.28

CPT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.83 is typical for the Residential REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMT vs. CPT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMT

5.07

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 5.24
Q3: 4.05
Median: 2.99
Q1: 2.10
Min: 1.28

AMT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.07 is in the upper quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CPT

1.14

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 5.11
Q3: 4.01
Median: 2.53
Q1: 1.52
Min: 0.52

In the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry, CPT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.14 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

AMT vs. CPT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	AMT	CPT
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.61	0.10
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.51	0.10
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	10.10	0.83
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	5.07	1.14

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMT vs. CPT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMT vs. CPT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMT

3.22%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 7.06%
Q3: 5.09%
Median: 4.51%
Q1: 3.18%
Min: 1.78%

AMT’s Dividend Yield of 3.22% is consistent with its peers in the Specialized REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CPT

3.08%

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 4.21%
Q3: 3.83%
Median: 3.40%
Q1: 3.27%
Min: 2.80%

CPT’s Dividend Yield of 3.08% is in the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

AMT vs. CPT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMT

111.40%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 295.93%
Q3: 182.11%
Median: 119.31%
Q1: 65.42%
Min: 43.86%

AMT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 111.40% is within the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CPT

214.13%

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 210.87%
Q3: 145.45%
Median: 102.94%
Q1: 84.58%
Min: 17.15%

At 214.13%, CPT’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Residential REITs industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

AMT vs. CPT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	AMT	CPT
Dividend Yield (TTM)	3.22%	3.08%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	111.40%	214.13%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMT

74.11

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 85.59
Q3: 64.69
Median: 29.09
Q1: 18.22
Min: 8.79

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.

CPT

95.15

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 177.01
Q3: 109.22
Median: 31.26
Q1: 25.84
Min: 8.46

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Residential REITs industry.

AMT vs. CPT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMT

9.34

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 14.35
Q3: 9.60
Median: 8.74
Q1: 5.61
Min: 1.63

AMT’s P/S Ratio of 9.34 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialized REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CPT

9.51

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 12.50
Q3: 10.33
Median: 8.01
Q1: 6.55
Min: 5.06

CPT’s P/S Ratio of 9.51 aligns with the market consensus for the Residential REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AMT vs. CPT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMT

27.87

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 11.33
Q3: 5.68
Median: 2.69
Q1: 1.81
Min: 0.71

At 27.87, AMT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Specialized REITs industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CPT

2.62

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 4.49
Q3: 2.83
Median: 2.20
Q1: 1.42
Min: 0.67

CPT’s P/B Ratio of 2.62 is within the conventional range for the Residential REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AMT vs. CPT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	AMT	CPT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	74.11	95.15
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	9.34	9.51
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	27.87	2.62
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	25.61	35.82