Seek Returns logo

AMH vs. KIM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMH and KIM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMH’s market capitalization stands at 13.16 billion USD, while KIM’s is 14.63 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

KIM carries a higher beta at 1.28, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AMH (beta: 0.77) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAMHKIM
Company NameAmerican Homes 4 RentKimco Realty Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorReal EstateReal Estate
IndustryREIT - ResidentialREIT - Retail
CEOBryan SmithConor C. Flynn
Price35.6 USD21.62 USD
Market Cap13.16 billion USD14.63 billion USD
Beta0.771.28
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateAugust 1, 2013November 22, 1991
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMH and KIM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMH vs. KIM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMH

5.78%

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
23.34%
Q3
9.08%
Median
3.28%
Q1
-1.03%
Min
-7.42%

Return on Equity is often not a primary performance indicator in the REIT - Residential industry.

KIM

5.24%

REIT - Retail Industry

Max
21.92%
Q3
12.41%
Median
7.21%
Q1
1.78%
Min
-4.50%

Return on Equity is often not a primary performance indicator in the REIT - Retail industry.

AMH vs. KIM: A comparison of their ROE against their respective REIT - Residential and REIT - Retail industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMH

4.43%

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
5.07%
Median
3.70%
Q1
2.44%
Min
-1.04%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the REIT - Residential industry.

KIM

3.87%

REIT - Retail Industry

Max
10.68%
Q3
6.77%
Median
5.71%
Q1
3.03%
Min
1.32%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the REIT - Retail industry.

AMH vs. KIM: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective REIT - Residential and REIT - Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMH

23.15%

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
38.86%
Q3
24.60%
Median
7.62%
Q1
-2.65%
Min
-12.57%

In the REIT - Residential industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

KIM

26.79%

REIT - Retail Industry

Max
45.09%
Q3
28.32%
Median
18.15%
Q1
10.14%
Min
-12.26%

In the REIT - Retail industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

AMH vs. KIM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective REIT - Residential and REIT - Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMH

24.05%

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
45.77%
Q3
30.12%
Median
19.58%
Q1
17.52%
Min
8.22%

In the REIT - Residential industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

KIM

32.80%

REIT - Retail Industry

Max
65.94%
Q3
46.00%
Median
35.03%
Q1
24.10%
Min
5.51%

In the REIT - Retail industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

AMH vs. KIM: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective REIT - Residential and REIT - Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMHKIM
Return on Equity (TTM)5.78%5.24%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.08%2.81%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)4.43%3.87%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)23.15%26.79%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)24.05%32.80%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.17%68.70%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMH

0.07

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
2.65
Q3
2.05
Median
0.62
Q1
0.13
Min
0.05

For the REIT - Residential industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

KIM

3.39

REIT - Retail Industry

Max
3.39
Q3
1.98
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.13

For the REIT - Retail industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

AMH vs. KIM: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective REIT - Residential and REIT - Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMH

0.69

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
1.76
Q3
1.60
Median
1.15
Q1
0.71
Min
0.06

Falling into the lower quartile for the REIT - Residential industry, AMH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

KIM

0.77

REIT - Retail Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.99
Median
1.03
Q1
0.77
Min
0.07

KIM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the REIT - Retail industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMH vs. KIM: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective REIT - Residential and REIT - Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMH

2.47

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
3.42
Median
2.09
Q1
0.77
Min
-0.24

AMH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.47 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the REIT - Residential industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KIM

2.16

REIT - Retail Industry

Max
4.88
Q3
2.85
Median
2.16
Q1
1.45
Min
0.24

KIM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.16 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the REIT - Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AMH vs. KIM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective REIT - Residential and REIT - Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMHKIM
Current Ratio (TTM)0.073.39
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.073.39
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.690.77
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.370.41
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)5.595.96
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.472.16

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMH and KIM. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMH vs. KIM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMH vs. KIM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMH vs. KIM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMH

3.15%

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
6.90%
Q3
5.06%
Median
3.70%
Q1
3.35%
Min
1.32%

AMH’s Dividend Yield of 3.15% is in the lower quartile for the REIT - Residential industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

KIM

4.58%

REIT - Retail Industry

Max
10.82%
Q3
5.31%
Median
4.63%
Q1
4.01%
Min
0.00%

KIM’s Dividend Yield of 4.58% is consistent with its peers in the REIT - Retail industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AMH vs. KIM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective REIT - Residential and REIT - Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMH

72.77%

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
647.59%
Q3
358.74%
Median
123.11%
Q1
73.29%
Min
0.00%

AMH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 72.77% is in the lower quartile for the REIT - Residential industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

KIM

125.33%

REIT - Retail Industry

Max
423.00%
Q3
209.73%
Median
147.41%
Q1
110.19%
Min
11.52%

KIM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 125.33% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

AMH vs. KIM: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective REIT - Residential and REIT - Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMHKIM
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.15%4.58%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)72.77%125.33%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMH

32.19

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
209.03
Q3
105.65
Median
37.25
Q1
29.74
Min
25.36

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the REIT - Residential industry.

KIM

26.40

REIT - Retail Industry

Max
61.28
Q3
51.98
Median
26.77
Q1
22.01
Min
1.22

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the REIT - Retail industry.

AMH vs. KIM: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective REIT - Residential and REIT - Retail industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMH

-0.32

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
8.96
Q3
6.40
Median
3.83
Q1
0.72
Min
0.26

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the REIT - Residential industry.

KIM

8.41

REIT - Retail Industry

Max
28.54
Q3
16.17
Median
7.98
Q1
4.29
Min
0.21

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the REIT - Retail industry.

AMH vs. KIM: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective REIT - Residential and REIT - Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMH

7.43

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
10.14
Q3
8.03
Median
7.51
Q1
5.76
Min
3.29

AMH’s P/S Ratio of 7.43 aligns with the market consensus for the REIT - Residential industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KIM

7.07

REIT - Retail Industry

Max
12.50
Q3
8.72
Median
6.69
Q1
5.52
Min
1.52

KIM’s P/S Ratio of 7.07 aligns with the market consensus for the REIT - Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AMH vs. KIM: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective REIT - Residential and REIT - Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMH

1.84

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
4.04
Q3
3.00
Median
2.31
Q1
1.78
Min
0.81

AMH’s P/B Ratio of 1.84 is within the conventional range for the REIT - Residential industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KIM

1.38

REIT - Retail Industry

Max
2.71
Q3
2.52
Median
1.58
Q1
1.33
Min
0.99

KIM’s P/B Ratio of 1.38 is within the conventional range for the REIT - Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AMH vs. KIM: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective REIT - Residential and REIT - Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMHKIM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)32.1926.40
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-0.328.41
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.437.07
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)1.841.38
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)18.6813.89
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)20.6916.85
EV-to-Sales (TTM)10.1910.94