AMH vs. KIM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at AMH and KIM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Overview
AMH’s market capitalization stands at 13.16 billion USD, while KIM’s is 14.63 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.
KIM carries a higher beta at 1.28, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AMH (beta: 0.77) exhibits greater stability.
Symbol | AMH | KIM |
---|---|---|
Company Name | American Homes 4 Rent | Kimco Realty Corporation |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Real Estate | Real Estate |
Industry | REIT - Residential | REIT - Retail |
CEO | Bryan Smith | Conor C. Flynn |
Price | 35.6 USD | 21.62 USD |
Market Cap | 13.16 billion USD | 14.63 billion USD |
Beta | 0.77 | 1.28 |
Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
IPO Date | August 1, 2013 | November 22, 1991 |
ADR | No | No |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of AMH and KIM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Profitability
Return on Equity
AMH
5.78%
REIT - Residential Industry
- Max
- 23.34%
- Q3
- 9.08%
- Median
- 3.28%
- Q1
- -1.03%
- Min
- -7.42%
Return on Equity is often not a primary performance indicator in the REIT - Residential industry.
KIM
5.24%
REIT - Retail Industry
- Max
- 21.92%
- Q3
- 12.41%
- Median
- 7.21%
- Q1
- 1.78%
- Min
- -4.50%
Return on Equity is often not a primary performance indicator in the REIT - Retail industry.
Return on Invested Capital
AMH
4.43%
REIT - Residential Industry
- Max
- 5.46%
- Q3
- 5.07%
- Median
- 3.70%
- Q1
- 2.44%
- Min
- -1.04%
Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the REIT - Residential industry.
KIM
3.87%
REIT - Retail Industry
- Max
- 10.68%
- Q3
- 6.77%
- Median
- 5.71%
- Q1
- 3.03%
- Min
- 1.32%
Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the REIT - Retail industry.
Net Profit Margin
AMH
23.15%
REIT - Residential Industry
- Max
- 38.86%
- Q3
- 24.60%
- Median
- 7.62%
- Q1
- -2.65%
- Min
- -12.57%
In the REIT - Residential industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.
KIM
26.79%
REIT - Retail Industry
- Max
- 45.09%
- Q3
- 28.32%
- Median
- 18.15%
- Q1
- 10.14%
- Min
- -12.26%
In the REIT - Retail industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.
Operating Profit Margin
AMH
24.05%
REIT - Residential Industry
- Max
- 45.77%
- Q3
- 30.12%
- Median
- 19.58%
- Q1
- 17.52%
- Min
- 8.22%
In the REIT - Residential industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.
KIM
32.80%
REIT - Retail Industry
- Max
- 65.94%
- Q3
- 46.00%
- Median
- 35.03%
- Q1
- 24.10%
- Min
- 5.51%
In the REIT - Retail industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.
Profitability at a Glance
Symbol | AMH | KIM |
---|---|---|
Return on Equity (TTM) | 5.78% | 5.24% |
Return on Assets (TTM) | 3.08% | 2.81% |
Return on Invested Capital (TTM) | 4.43% | 3.87% |
Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 23.15% | 26.79% |
Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 24.05% | 32.80% |
Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 56.17% | 68.70% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio
AMH
0.07
REIT - Residential Industry
- Max
- 2.65
- Q3
- 2.05
- Median
- 0.62
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.05
For the REIT - Residential industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.
KIM
3.39
REIT - Retail Industry
- Max
- 3.39
- Q3
- 1.98
- Median
- 0.71
- Q1
- 0.45
- Min
- 0.13
For the REIT - Retail industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio
AMH
0.69
REIT - Residential Industry
- Max
- 1.76
- Q3
- 1.60
- Median
- 1.15
- Q1
- 0.71
- Min
- 0.06
Falling into the lower quartile for the REIT - Residential industry, AMH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
KIM
0.77
REIT - Retail Industry
- Max
- 1.99
- Q3
- 1.99
- Median
- 1.03
- Q1
- 0.77
- Min
- 0.07
KIM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the REIT - Retail industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
Interest Coverage Ratio
AMH
2.47
REIT - Residential Industry
- Max
- 4.02
- Q3
- 3.42
- Median
- 2.09
- Q1
- 0.77
- Min
- -0.24
AMH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.47 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the REIT - Residential industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
KIM
2.16
REIT - Retail Industry
- Max
- 4.88
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 2.16
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.24
KIM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.16 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the REIT - Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
Financial Strength at a Glance
Symbol | AMH | KIM |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.07 | 3.39 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.07 | 3.39 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.69 | 0.77 |
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM) | 0.37 | 0.41 |
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM) | 5.59 | 5.96 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 2.47 | 2.16 |
Growth
The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMH and KIM. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.
Revenue Growth
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth
Free Cash Flow Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield
AMH
3.15%
REIT - Residential Industry
- Max
- 6.90%
- Q3
- 5.06%
- Median
- 3.70%
- Q1
- 3.35%
- Min
- 1.32%
AMH’s Dividend Yield of 3.15% is in the lower quartile for the REIT - Residential industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.
KIM
4.58%
REIT - Retail Industry
- Max
- 10.82%
- Q3
- 5.31%
- Median
- 4.63%
- Q1
- 4.01%
- Min
- 0.00%
KIM’s Dividend Yield of 4.58% is consistent with its peers in the REIT - Retail industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.
Dividend Payout Ratio
AMH
72.77%
REIT - Residential Industry
- Max
- 647.59%
- Q3
- 358.74%
- Median
- 123.11%
- Q1
- 73.29%
- Min
- 0.00%
AMH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 72.77% is in the lower quartile for the REIT - Residential industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.
KIM
125.33%
REIT - Retail Industry
- Max
- 423.00%
- Q3
- 209.73%
- Median
- 147.41%
- Q1
- 110.19%
- Min
- 11.52%
KIM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 125.33% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.
Dividend at a Glance
Symbol | AMH | KIM |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.15% | 4.58% |
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 72.77% | 125.33% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio
AMH
32.19
REIT - Residential Industry
- Max
- 209.03
- Q3
- 105.65
- Median
- 37.25
- Q1
- 29.74
- Min
- 25.36
The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the REIT - Residential industry.
KIM
26.40
REIT - Retail Industry
- Max
- 61.28
- Q3
- 51.98
- Median
- 26.77
- Q1
- 22.01
- Min
- 1.22
The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the REIT - Retail industry.
Forward P/E to Growth Ratio
AMH
-0.32
REIT - Residential Industry
- Max
- 8.96
- Q3
- 6.40
- Median
- 3.83
- Q1
- 0.72
- Min
- 0.26
The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the REIT - Residential industry.
KIM
8.41
REIT - Retail Industry
- Max
- 28.54
- Q3
- 16.17
- Median
- 7.98
- Q1
- 4.29
- Min
- 0.21
The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the REIT - Retail industry.
Price-to-Sales Ratio
AMH
7.43
REIT - Residential Industry
- Max
- 10.14
- Q3
- 8.03
- Median
- 7.51
- Q1
- 5.76
- Min
- 3.29
AMH’s P/S Ratio of 7.43 aligns with the market consensus for the REIT - Residential industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
KIM
7.07
REIT - Retail Industry
- Max
- 12.50
- Q3
- 8.72
- Median
- 6.69
- Q1
- 5.52
- Min
- 1.52
KIM’s P/S Ratio of 7.07 aligns with the market consensus for the REIT - Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
Price-to-Book Ratio
AMH
1.84
REIT - Residential Industry
- Max
- 4.04
- Q3
- 3.00
- Median
- 2.31
- Q1
- 1.78
- Min
- 0.81
AMH’s P/B Ratio of 1.84 is within the conventional range for the REIT - Residential industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.
KIM
1.38
REIT - Retail Industry
- Max
- 2.71
- Q3
- 2.52
- Median
- 1.58
- Q1
- 1.33
- Min
- 0.99
KIM’s P/B Ratio of 1.38 is within the conventional range for the REIT - Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.
Valuation at a Glance
Symbol | AMH | KIM |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 32.19 | 26.40 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -0.32 | 8.41 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.43 | 7.07 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 1.84 | 1.38 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 18.68 | 13.89 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 20.69 | 16.85 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 10.19 | 10.94 |