Seek Returns logo

AMH vs. CSGP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMH and CSGP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

A key difference in structure is that AMH is a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), a company that primarily invests in income-generating real estate, whereas CSGP is a conventional stock.

SymbolAMHCSGP
Company NameAmerican Homes 4 RentCoStar Group, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryResidential REITsReal Estate Management & Development
Market Capitalization14.82 billion USD37.39 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateAugust 1, 2013July 1, 1998
Security TypeREITCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMH and CSGP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMH vs. CSGP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMHCSGP
5-Day Price Return1.45%0.32%
13-Week Price Return-9.52%14.74%
26-Week Price Return-2.07%19.97%
52-Week Price Return-9.00%17.81%
Month-to-Date Return1.15%-7.29%
Year-to-Date Return-6.23%23.27%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.76M3.12M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.06M3.07M
3-Month Volatility16.11%25.65%
Beta0.780.90

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMH

5.99%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
12.21%
Q3
9.45%
Median
7.42%
Q1
2.50%
Min
0.37%

AMH’s Return on Equity of 5.99% is on par with the norm for the Residential REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CSGP

1.29%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
14.65%
Q3
8.92%
Median
3.63%
Q1
1.63%
Min
-8.05%

CSGP’s Return on Equity of 1.29% is in the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

AMH vs. CSGP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMH

23.72%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
67.49%
Q3
38.86%
Median
25.74%
Q1
7.62%
Min
0.15%

In the Residential REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

CSGP

3.57%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
57.16%
Q3
24.60%
Median
9.48%
Q1
2.61%
Min
-26.61%

CSGP’s Net Profit Margin of 3.57% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMH vs. CSGP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMH

13.07%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
54.06%
Q3
45.82%
Median
29.89%
Q1
19.34%
Min
5.28%

In the Residential REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

CSGP

-0.22%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
92.29%
Q3
43.61%
Median
20.96%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-48.90%

CSGP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.22%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AMH vs. CSGP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMHCSGP
Return on Equity (TTM)5.99%1.29%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.21%1.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)23.72%3.57%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.07%-0.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.50%79.33%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMH

0.64

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.28
Q3
0.64
Median
0.21
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

AMH’s Current Ratio of 0.64 aligns with the median group of the Residential REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CSGP

5.83

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.22
Median
1.42
Q1
1.03
Min
0.04

CSGP’s Current Ratio of 5.83 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

AMH vs. CSGP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Residential REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMH

0.72

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.62
Q3
1.10
Median
0.83
Q1
0.69
Min
0.28

AMH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Residential REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CSGP

0.12

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.30
Median
0.84
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, CSGP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.12 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AMH vs. CSGP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Residential REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMH

2.53

Residential REITs Industry

Max
5.11
Q3
4.01
Median
2.53
Q1
1.52
Min
0.52

AMH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Residential REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CSGP

14.65

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
23.14
Q3
12.97
Median
3.68
Q1
1.29
Min
-4.45

CSGP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.65 is in the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AMH vs. CSGP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMHCSGP
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.645.83
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.645.72
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.720.12
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.5314.65

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMH vs. CSGP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMH vs. CSGP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMH

3.31%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.21%
Q3
3.83%
Median
3.40%
Q1
3.27%
Min
2.80%

AMH’s Dividend Yield of 3.31% is consistent with its peers in the Residential REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CSGP

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
6.79%
Q3
3.51%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

CSGP currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AMH vs. CSGP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMH

100.80%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
210.87%
Q3
145.45%
Median
102.94%
Q1
84.58%
Min
17.15%

AMH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 100.80% is within the typical range for the Residential REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CSGP

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
242.45%
Q3
106.13%
Median
55.27%
Q1
14.97%
Min
0.00%

CSGP has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AMH vs. CSGP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMHCSGP
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.31%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)100.80%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMH

30.42

Residential REITs Industry

Max
177.01
Q3
109.22
Median
31.26
Q1
25.84
Min
8.46

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Residential REITs industry.

CSGP

362.01

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
41.09
Q3
23.50
Median
17.29
Q1
11.14
Min
6.36

At 362.01, CSGP’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AMH vs. CSGP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMH

7.21

Residential REITs Industry

Max
12.50
Q3
10.33
Median
8.01
Q1
6.55
Min
5.06

AMH’s P/S Ratio of 7.21 aligns with the market consensus for the Residential REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CSGP

12.94

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
12.22
Q3
5.64
Median
2.53
Q1
0.98
Min
0.01

With a P/S Ratio of 12.94, CSGP trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AMH vs. CSGP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMH

1.86

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.83
Median
2.20
Q1
1.42
Min
0.67

AMH’s P/B Ratio of 1.86 is within the conventional range for the Residential REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CSGP

3.94

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.36
Q3
1.18
Median
0.75
Q1
0.35
Min
0.06

At 3.94, CSGP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AMH vs. CSGP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Residential REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMHCSGP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)30.42362.01
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.2112.94
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.863.94
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)3,495.271,278.71