Seek Returns logo

AMH vs. BXP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMH and BXP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both AMH and BXP are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

SymbolAMHBXP
Company NameAmerican Homes 4 RentBXP, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryResidential REITsOffice REITs
Market Capitalization14.82 billion USD11.75 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateAugust 1, 2013June 18, 1997
Security TypeREITREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMH and BXP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMH vs. BXP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMHBXP
5-Day Price Return1.45%1.87%
13-Week Price Return-9.52%-2.16%
26-Week Price Return-2.07%-6.78%
52-Week Price Return-9.00%-6.80%
Month-to-Date Return1.15%1.53%
Year-to-Date Return-6.23%-10.66%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.76M1.41M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.06M1.62M
3-Month Volatility16.11%30.65%
Beta0.781.24

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMH

5.99%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
12.21%
Q3
9.45%
Median
7.42%
Q1
2.50%
Min
0.37%

AMH’s Return on Equity of 5.99% is on par with the norm for the Residential REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BXP

0.09%

Office REITs Industry

Max
9.47%
Q3
6.07%
Median
3.22%
Q1
0.83%
Min
-0.08%

BXP’s Return on Equity of 0.09% is in the lower quartile for the Office REITs industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

AMH vs. BXP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Office REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMH

23.72%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
67.49%
Q3
38.86%
Median
25.74%
Q1
7.62%
Min
0.15%

In the Residential REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

BXP

0.14%

Office REITs Industry

Max
74.75%
Q3
44.46%
Median
31.39%
Q1
5.85%
Min
-0.35%

In the Office REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

AMH vs. BXP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Office REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMH

13.07%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
54.06%
Q3
45.82%
Median
29.89%
Q1
19.34%
Min
5.28%

In the Residential REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

BXP

29.78%

Office REITs Industry

Max
91.62%
Q3
51.67%
Median
42.78%
Q1
23.56%
Min
14.93%

In the Office REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

AMH vs. BXP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Office REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMHBXP
Return on Equity (TTM)5.99%0.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.21%0.02%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)23.72%0.14%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.07%29.78%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.50%60.37%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMH

0.64

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.28
Q3
0.64
Median
0.21
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

AMH’s Current Ratio of 0.64 aligns with the median group of the Residential REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BXP

1.13

Office REITs Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
1.22
Median
0.67
Q1
0.44
Min
0.14

BXP’s Current Ratio of 1.13 aligns with the median group of the Office REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMH vs. BXP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Residential REITs and Office REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMH

0.72

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.62
Q3
1.10
Median
0.83
Q1
0.69
Min
0.28

AMH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Residential REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BXP

3.08

Office REITs Industry

Max
1.62
Q3
1.32
Median
0.87
Q1
0.73
Min
0.42

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.08, BXP operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Office REITs industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AMH vs. BXP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Residential REITs and Office REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMH

2.53

Residential REITs Industry

Max
5.11
Q3
4.01
Median
2.53
Q1
1.52
Min
0.52

AMH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Residential REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BXP

1.09

Office REITs Industry

Max
3.98
Q3
3.37
Median
1.66
Q1
1.16
Min
0.14

In the lower quartile for the Office REITs industry, BXP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.09 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

AMH vs. BXP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Office REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMHBXP
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.641.13
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.641.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.723.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.531.09

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMH vs. BXP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMH vs. BXP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMH

3.31%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.21%
Q3
3.83%
Median
3.40%
Q1
3.27%
Min
2.80%

AMH’s Dividend Yield of 3.31% is consistent with its peers in the Residential REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BXP

6.53%

Office REITs Industry

Max
6.88%
Q3
5.94%
Median
4.58%
Q1
3.82%
Min
1.22%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.53%, BXP offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Office REITs industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AMH vs. BXP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Office REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMH

100.80%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
210.87%
Q3
145.45%
Median
102.94%
Q1
84.58%
Min
17.15%

AMH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 100.80% is within the typical range for the Residential REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BXP

222.09%

Office REITs Industry

Max
231.12%
Q3
180.65%
Median
94.76%
Q1
87.60%
Min
1.02%

BXP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 222.09% is in the upper quartile for the Office REITs industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AMH vs. BXP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Office REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMHBXP
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.31%6.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)100.80%222.09%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMH

30.42

Residential REITs Industry

Max
177.01
Q3
109.22
Median
31.26
Q1
25.84
Min
8.46

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Residential REITs industry.

BXP

2,149.06

Office REITs Industry

Max
48.29
Q3
44.14
Median
23.60
Q1
18.77
Min
6.08

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Office REITs industry.

AMH vs. BXP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Office REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMH

7.21

Residential REITs Industry

Max
12.50
Q3
10.33
Median
8.01
Q1
6.55
Min
5.06

AMH’s P/S Ratio of 7.21 aligns with the market consensus for the Residential REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BXP

3.07

Office REITs Industry

Max
14.09
Q3
9.33
Median
6.96
Q1
4.25
Min
2.65

In the lower quartile for the Office REITs industry, BXP’s P/S Ratio of 3.07 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AMH vs. BXP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Office REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMH

1.86

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.83
Median
2.20
Q1
1.42
Min
0.67

AMH’s P/B Ratio of 1.86 is within the conventional range for the Residential REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BXP

2.03

Office REITs Industry

Max
2.06
Q3
1.34
Median
1.02
Q1
0.68
Min
0.57

BXP’s P/B Ratio of 2.03 is in the upper tier for the Office REITs industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AMH vs. BXP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Residential REITs and Office REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMHBXP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)30.422,149.06
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.213.07
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.862.03
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)3,495.27110.75