AMGN vs. CI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMGN and CI, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AMGN dominates in value with a market cap of 145.90 billion USD, eclipsing CI’s 84.71 billion USD by roughly 1.72×.
With betas of 0.50 for AMGN and 0.48 for CI, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AMGN | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Amgen Inc. | Cigna Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Healthcare | Healthcare |
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - General | Medical - Healthcare Plans |
| CEO | Mr. Robert A. Bradway | Mr. David Michael Cordani |
| Price | 271.34 USD | 317.09 USD |
| Market Cap | 145.90 billion USD | 84.71 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.50 | 0.48 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | June 17, 1983 | March 31, 1982 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMGN and CI over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AMGN and CI, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AMGN | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 24.60 | 17.66 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 7.08 | 1.52 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.28 | 0.33 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 23.52 | 2.21 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 13.37 | 14.09 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 15.71 | 9.69 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 5.70 | 0.42 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 17.82 | 17.77 |
Dividend Comparison
AMGN’s dividend yield of 3.41% is about 90% higher than CI’s 1.80%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | AMGN | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.41% | 1.80% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMGN and CI, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- CI’s current ratio of 0.78 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas AMGN at 1.17 maintains healthy liquidity.
- CI posts a quick ratio of 0.69, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AMGN at 0.88 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- AMGN is heavily leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 9.24), which can boost returns but raises risk if borrowing costs climb, while CI at 0.76 keeps leverage at a more moderate level.
| Symbol | AMGN | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.17 | 0.78 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.88 | 0.69 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 9.24 | 0.76 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.64 | 0.20 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 3.19 | 4.64 |