AME vs. URI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AME and URI, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With AME at 41.02 billion USD and URI at 45.23 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
URI carries a higher beta at 1.70, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AME remains steadier at 1.12.
| Symbol | AME | URI |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AMETEK, Inc. | United Rentals, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Rental & Leasing Services |
| CEO | Mr. David A. Zapico | Mr. Matthew J. Flannery |
| Price | 177.68 USD | 695.8 USD |
| Market Cap | 41.02 billion USD | 45.23 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.12 | 1.70 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | July 19, 1984 | December 18, 1997 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AME and URI over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AME and URI, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AME | URI |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 28.93 | 17.82 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 3.87 | 1.30 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 5.91 | 2.90 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 4.11 | 5.17 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 23.94 | 70.78 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 20.29 | 9.14 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.13 | 3.77 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 24.83 | 91.83 |
Dividend Comparison
URI stands out with a 0.98% dividend yield—around 52% above AME’s 0.65%—highlighting its emphasis on generous payouts.
| Symbol | AME | URI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.65% | 0.98% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AME and URI, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- URI’s current ratio of 0.85 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas AME at 1.41 maintains healthy liquidity.
- URI posts a quick ratio of 0.79, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AME at 0.86 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
| Symbol | AME | URI |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.41 | 0.85 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.86 | 0.79 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.19 | 1.59 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.13 | 0.50 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 23.38 | 5.62 |