AME vs. ROP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AME and ROP, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ROP stands out with 61.59 billion USD in market value—about 1.50× AME’s market cap of 41.02 billion USD.
With betas of 1.12 for AME and 1.08 for ROP, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AME | ROP |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AMETEK, Inc. | Roper Technologies, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| CEO | Mr. David A. Zapico | Mr. Laurence Neil Hunn |
| Price | 177.68 USD | 572.81 USD |
| Market Cap | 41.02 billion USD | 61.59 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.12 | 1.08 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | July 19, 1984 | February 13, 1992 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AME and ROP over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AME and ROP, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AME | ROP |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 28.93 | 41.06 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 3.87 | 3.78 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 5.91 | 8.50 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 4.11 | 3.20 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 23.94 | 26.77 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 20.29 | 23.05 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.13 | 8.45 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 24.83 | 26.61 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AME and ROP offer similar dividend yields (0.65% vs. 0.55%), indicating comparable approaches to balancing income and growth.
| Symbol | AME | ROP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.65% | 0.55% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AME and ROP, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ROP’s current ratio of 0.46 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas AME at 1.41 maintains healthy liquidity.
- ROP posts a quick ratio of 0.43, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AME at 0.86 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
| Symbol | AME | ROP |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.41 | 0.46 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.86 | 0.43 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.19 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.13 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 23.38 | 7.59 |