Seek Returns logo

AMD vs. PG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMD and PG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAMDPG
Company NameAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.The Procter & Gamble Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyConsumer Staples
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentHousehold Products
Market Capitalization267.23 billion USD356.39 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMD and PG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMD vs. PG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMDPG
5-Day Price Return2.05%-0.82%
13-Week Price Return19.40%-5.32%
26-Week Price Return60.28%-10.65%
52-Week Price Return3.06%-11.43%
Month-to-Date Return1.78%-0.90%
Year-to-Date Return36.33%-9.17%
10-Day Avg. Volume39.91M7.29M
3-Month Avg. Volume52.40M7.72M
3-Month Volatility40.60%14.63%
Beta1.890.39

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMD

4.88%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

AMD’s Return on Equity of 4.88% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PG

30.78%

Household Products Industry

Max
216.14%
Q3
106.01%
Median
19.09%
Q1
9.92%
Min
-6.34%

PG’s Return on Equity of 30.78% is on par with the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AMD vs. PG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMD

9.57%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

AMD’s Net Profit Margin of 9.57% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PG

18.95%

Household Products Industry

Max
14.55%
Q3
12.50%
Median
8.91%
Q1
8.67%
Min
5.05%

PG’s Net Profit Margin of 18.95% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

AMD vs. PG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMD

7.66%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

AMD’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.66% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PG

23.32%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.76%
Q3
16.17%
Median
13.11%
Q1
12.17%
Min
6.87%

PG’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.32% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

AMD vs. PG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMDPG
Return on Equity (TTM)4.88%30.78%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.97%12.85%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.57%18.95%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.66%23.32%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)47.62%51.34%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMD

2.49

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

AMD’s Current Ratio of 2.49 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PG

0.70

Household Products Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.96
Median
1.21
Q1
0.79
Min
0.50

PG’s Current Ratio of 0.70 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AMD vs. PG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMD

0.05

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

AMD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.05 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PG

0.66

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.58
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

PG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.66 is typical for the Household Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMD vs. PG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMD

14.93

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

AMD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.93 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PG

47.04

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
17.04
Q1
9.99
Min
5.60

PG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 47.04 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AMD vs. PG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMDPG
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.490.70
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.560.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.050.66
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.9347.04

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMD vs. PG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMD vs. PG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMD

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PG

2.76%

Household Products Industry

Max
6.79%
Q3
3.95%
Median
2.83%
Q1
2.02%
Min
1.34%

PG’s Dividend Yield of 2.76% is consistent with its peers in the Household Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AMD vs. PG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMD

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PG

61.80%

Household Products Industry

Max
187.99%
Q3
110.64%
Median
74.63%
Q1
58.31%
Min
30.76%

PG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.80% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AMD vs. PG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMDPG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.76%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%61.80%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMD

94.29

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

A P/E Ratio of 94.29 places AMD in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

PG

22.35

Household Products Industry

Max
30.25
Q3
22.11
Median
20.35
Q1
15.19
Min
13.52

A P/E Ratio of 22.35 places PG in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AMD vs. PG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMD

9.03

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

AMD’s P/S Ratio of 9.03 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PG

4.24

Household Products Industry

Max
4.23
Q3
2.58
Median
1.98
Q1
1.29
Min
1.03

With a P/S Ratio of 4.24, PG trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Household Products industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AMD vs. PG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMD

3.86

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

AMD’s P/B Ratio of 3.86 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PG

7.14

Household Products Industry

Max
46.10
Q3
21.55
Median
5.33
Q1
2.16
Min
1.41

PG’s P/B Ratio of 7.14 is within the conventional range for the Household Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AMD vs. PG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMDPG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)94.2922.35
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.034.24
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.867.14
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)66.0925.42