AMCR vs. RH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMCR and RH, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AMCR dominates in value with a market cap of 21.16 billion USD, eclipsing RH’s 3.66 billion USD by roughly 5.78×.
RH carries a higher beta at 2.36, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AMCR remains steadier at 0.78.
| Symbol | AMCR | RH |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Amcor plc | RH |
| Country | CH | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Specialty Retail |
| CEO | Mr. Peter Konieczny Dip Eng, MBA, MSc Mech Eng | Mr. Gary G. Friedman |
| Price | 9.18 USD | 195.6 USD |
| Market Cap | 21.16 billion USD | 3.66 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.78 | 2.36 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | May 15, 2012 | November 2, 2012 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMCR and RH over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AMCR and RH based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- RH carries a sub-zero price-to-book ratio of -22.28, indicating negative equity. In contrast, AMCR (P/B 3.44) has positive book value.
- RH reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -17.14, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while AMCR at 19.42 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | AMCR | RH |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.24 | 50.33 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.91 | 1.51 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.08 | 1.15 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 3.44 | -22.28 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 19.42 | -17.14 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 28.40 | 16.47 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.13 | 2.38 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 26.03 | -35.43 |
Dividend Comparison
AMCR delivers a 5.53% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas RH appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | AMCR | RH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 5.53% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMCR and RH, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- RH posts a quick ratio of 0.30, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AMCR at 1.16 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- RH has negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -24.07), suggesting asset shortfalls, whereas AMCR at 2.40 preserves healthier equity coverage.
- RH carries a debt-to-assets ratio of 0.86, suggesting substantial asset funding via debt, while AMCR at 0.51 opts for a more conservative financing structure.
| Symbol | AMCR | RH |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.70 | 1.43 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.16 | 0.30 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 2.40 | -24.07 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.51 | 0.86 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 8.38 | 1.42 |