Seek Returns logo

AMCR vs. HAS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMCR and HAS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAMCRHAS
Company NameAmcor plcHasbro, Inc.
CountrySwitzerlandUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingLeisure Products
Market Capitalization19.61 billion USD11.44 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 15, 2012March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMCR and HAS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMCR vs. HAS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMCRHAS
5-Day Price Return-1.62%2.71%
13-Week Price Return-7.20%21.04%
26-Week Price Return-16.98%20.72%
52-Week Price Return-23.81%19.05%
Month-to-Date Return-8.98%8.52%
Year-to-Date Return-9.56%45.88%
10-Day Avg. Volume35.69M1.37M
3-Month Avg. Volume31.23M2.23M
3-Month Volatility30.73%23.67%
Beta0.740.63

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMCR

20.91%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

In the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, AMCR’s Return on Equity of 20.91% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

HAS

-58.96%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
35.76%
Q3
21.83%
Median
14.83%
Q1
5.19%
Min
-14.10%

HAS has a negative Return on Equity of -58.96%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AMCR vs. HAS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMCR

5.99%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

AMCR’s Net Profit Margin of 5.99% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HAS

-13.37%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
13.45%
Q3
10.46%
Median
9.86%
Q1
4.71%
Min
-0.81%

HAS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -13.37%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AMCR vs. HAS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMCR

9.78%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

AMCR’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.78% is around the midpoint for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HAS

-8.06%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
15.65%
Q3
14.39%
Median
12.60%
Q1
8.85%
Min
2.80%

HAS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -8.06%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AMCR vs. HAS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMCRHAS
Return on Equity (TTM)20.91%-58.96%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.77%-9.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.99%-13.37%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.78%-8.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.00%65.02%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMCR

1.70

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

AMCR’s Current Ratio of 1.70 is in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

HAS

1.66

Leisure Products Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
3.37
Median
2.25
Q1
1.67
Min
1.12

HAS’s Current Ratio of 1.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Leisure Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AMCR vs. HAS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMCR

2.28

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

AMCR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Containers & Packaging industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.28. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

HAS

13.77

Leisure Products Industry

Max
1.68
Q3
1.13
Median
0.29
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 13.77, HAS operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Leisure Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AMCR vs. HAS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

3.93

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

AMCR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.93 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HAS

5.34

Leisure Products Industry

Max
30.53
Q3
28.24
Median
14.76
Q1
5.23
Min
-6.13

HAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.34 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Leisure Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AMCR vs. HAS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMCRHAS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.701.66
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.021.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.2813.77
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.935.34

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMCR vs. HAS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMCR vs. HAS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMCR

3.71%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

AMCR’s Dividend Yield of 3.71% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

HAS

3.50%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.67%
Median
1.92%
Q1
1.26%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.50%, HAS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Leisure Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AMCR vs. HAS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

90.46%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

AMCR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 90.46% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HAS

63.63%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
133.30%
Q3
85.97%
Median
68.01%
Q1
48.42%
Min
0.00%

HAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.63% is within the typical range for the Leisure Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AMCR vs. HAS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMCRHAS
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.71%3.50%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)90.46%63.63%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

24.37

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

AMCR’s P/E Ratio of 24.37 is within the middle range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HAS

--

Leisure Products Industry

Max
39.62
Q3
29.98
Median
25.12
Q1
17.43
Min
10.66

P/E Ratio data for HAS is currently unavailable.

AMCR vs. HAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

1.46

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

AMCR’s P/S Ratio of 1.46 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HAS

2.63

Leisure Products Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.93
Median
1.67
Q1
1.14
Min
0.43

HAS’s P/S Ratio of 2.63 aligns with the market consensus for the Leisure Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AMCR vs. HAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMCR

3.64

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

AMCR’s P/B Ratio of 3.64 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

HAS

42.90

Leisure Products Industry

Max
7.37
Q3
4.91
Median
3.05
Q1
1.94
Min
1.37

At 42.90, HAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Leisure Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AMCR vs. HAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMCRHAS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.37--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.462.63
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.6442.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.7222.38