Seek Returns logo

AMAT vs. SAIL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMAT and SAIL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMAT’s market capitalization of 153.32 billion USD is substantially larger than SAIL’s 12.33 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

SymbolAMATSAIL
Company NameApplied Materials, Inc.SailPoint, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsSoftware - Infrastructure
CEOGary E. DickersonMark D. McClain TTEE
Price191.05 USD22.16 USD
Market Cap153.32 billion USD12.33 billion USD
Beta1.66--
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980February 13, 2025
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMAT and SAIL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMAT vs. SAIL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMAT

35.84%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, AMAT’s Return on Equity of 35.84% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SAIL

-30.01%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

SAIL has a negative Return on Equity of -30.01%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AMAT vs. SAIL: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMAT

25.68%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, AMAT’s Return on Invested Capital of 25.68% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

SAIL

-6.87%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

SAIL has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -6.87%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

AMAT vs. SAIL: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMAT

24.06%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 24.06% places AMAT in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SAIL

-70.01%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

SAIL has a negative Net Profit Margin of -70.01%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AMAT vs. SAIL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMAT

29.66%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.66% places AMAT in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SAIL

-63.79%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

SAIL has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -63.79%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AMAT vs. SAIL: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMATSAIL
Return on Equity (TTM)35.84%-30.01%
Return on Assets (TTM)20.09%-8.13%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)25.68%-6.87%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)24.06%-70.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.66%-63.79%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.14%58.49%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMAT

2.46

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

AMAT’s Current Ratio of 2.46 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SAIL

1.17

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

SAIL’s Current Ratio of 1.17 aligns with the median group of the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMAT vs. SAIL: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMAT

0.33

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AMAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.33 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SAIL

0.00

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Software - Infrastructure industry, SAIL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AMAT vs. SAIL: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMAT

31.92

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

AMAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 31.92 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

SAIL

-2.52

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

SAIL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -2.52. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AMAT vs. SAIL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMATSAIL
Current Ratio (TTM)2.461.17
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.761.17
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.330.00
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.190.00
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.010.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)31.92-2.52

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMAT and SAIL. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMAT vs. SAIL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMAT vs. SAIL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMAT vs. SAIL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMAT

0.87%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMAT’s Dividend Yield of 0.87% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SAIL

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SAIL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AMAT vs. SAIL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMAT

18.53%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.53% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SAIL

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SAIL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AMAT vs. SAIL: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMATSAIL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.87%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.53%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMAT

22.93

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

AMAT’s P/E Ratio of 22.93 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SAIL

-18.38

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

SAIL has a negative P/E Ratio of -18.38. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

AMAT vs. SAIL: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMAT

3.41

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

SAIL

6.04

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

A Forward PEG Ratio of 6.04 places SAIL in the upper quartile for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

AMAT vs. SAIL: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMAT

5.46

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

AMAT’s P/S Ratio of 5.46 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SAIL

14.33

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

SAIL’s P/S Ratio of 14.33 is in the upper echelon for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AMAT vs. SAIL: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMAT

8.17

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

AMAT’s P/B Ratio of 8.17 is in the upper tier for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SAIL

1.63

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

AMAT vs. SAIL: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMATSAIL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)22.93-18.38
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.416.04
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.4614.33
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)8.171.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)25.83-60.97
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)17.57-39.16
EV-to-Sales (TTM)5.4614.09