Seek Returns logo

AMAT vs. ORCL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMAT and ORCL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAMATORCL
Company NameApplied Materials, Inc.Oracle Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentSoftware
Market Capitalization173.29 billion USD815.73 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980March 12, 1986
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMAT and ORCL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMAT vs. ORCL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMATORCL
5-Day Price Return6.14%1.20%
13-Week Price Return13.86%20.57%
26-Week Price Return49.90%104.66%
52-Week Price Return8.14%70.62%
Month-to-Date Return6.25%1.74%
Year-to-Date Return33.76%71.71%
10-Day Avg. Volume10.23M28.17M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.73M18.95M
3-Month Volatility43.10%81.84%
Beta1.671.65

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMAT

35.91%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, AMAT’s Return on Equity of 35.91% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ORCL

66.28%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

In the upper quartile for the Software industry, ORCL’s Return on Equity of 66.28% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AMAT vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMAT

23.88%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

AMAT’s Net Profit Margin of 23.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ORCL

21.08%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.08% places ORCL in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AMAT vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMAT

30.14%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.14% places AMAT in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ORCL

30.44%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.44% places ORCL in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AMAT vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMATORCL
Return on Equity (TTM)35.91%66.28%
Return on Assets (TTM)20.15%7.56%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)23.88%21.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)30.14%30.44%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.50%69.66%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMAT

2.50

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

AMAT’s Current Ratio of 2.50 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ORCL

0.62

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

ORCL’s Current Ratio of 0.62 falls into the lower quartile for the Software industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AMAT vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMAT

0.32

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

AMAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.32 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ORCL

3.78

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.78, ORCL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Software industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AMAT vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMAT

41.21

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

AMAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 41.21 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ORCL

4.92

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

ORCL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AMAT vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMATORCL
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.500.62
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.690.50
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.323.78
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)41.214.92

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMAT vs. ORCL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMAT vs. ORCL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMAT

0.76%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMAT’s Dividend Yield of 0.76% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ORCL

0.61%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ORCL’s Dividend Yield of 0.61% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

AMAT vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMAT

19.73%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.73% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ORCL

40.62%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 40.62%, ORCL’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

AMAT vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMATORCL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.76%0.61%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)19.73%40.62%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMAT

26.07

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

AMAT’s P/E Ratio of 26.07 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ORCL

67.00

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

ORCL’s P/E Ratio of 67.00 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AMAT vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMAT

6.23

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

AMAT’s P/S Ratio of 6.23 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ORCL

14.12

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

ORCL’s P/S Ratio of 14.12 is in the upper echelon for the Software industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AMAT vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMAT

7.83

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

AMAT’s P/B Ratio of 7.83 is in the upper tier for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ORCL

26.30

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

ORCL’s P/B Ratio of 26.30 is in the upper tier for the Software industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AMAT vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMATORCL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.0767.00
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.2314.12
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.8326.30
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.5998.32
AMAT vs. ORCL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison